Spelling suggestions: "subject:"organizations"" "subject:"organzation""
1 |
Ideella föreningars hantering av GDPR / Non-profit organizations' handling of GDPRHenriksson, Samuel January 2020 (has links)
Personuppgiftlagen (PUL) fanns mellan 1992 och 2018 för att skydda människors personliga integritet. The General data protection regulation tog över 2018 dels för att fylla i de luckorsom fanns i PUL men också för att samma regler skulle gälla i alla EUs medlemsländer. För alla organisationer innebar det förändringar om på vilket sätt de ska hantera personuppgifter (Danielsson, Nilsson och Lindström 2019a). I den kvalitativa studie intervjuas respondenter från fem olika ideella föreningar för att ta reda på hur de har valt hantera dataskyddsförordningen. Studien kommer att fokusera på hur föreningarna skyddar sitt medlemsregister, skillnaden på hur de arbetar med personuppgifter nu kontra innan GDPR, hur de aktivt arbetar för att följa GDPR och vilka förändringar de har tvingats genomgå.
|
2 |
Zapojení uživatelů do reformy psychiatrické péče / Involving users in the psychiatric care reformWolfová, Magdaléna January 2018 (has links)
The subject of this diploma thesis is the involvement of users of psychiatric care in the process of planning and realization of psychiatric care reform at the macro level of policy making. The aim of the research is to describe and understand this involvement. In the research are describer possibilities of participation in the phases of involvement, its form, purpose, formal regulation of opportunities, expectations of respondents, perceived power and barriers in involvement. The data was collected during interviews with key actors and studies of relevant documents. The results relate to the theoretical concepts of coproduction, patient-oriented care, strategic and human rights documents (the Convention on the Human Rights of People with Disabilities). The element of power is described through the typology of Sherry Arnstein's participation ladder. Evidence of interviews indicates elements of tokenism and disadvantages. There is a low (one-person) representation of users in reform bodies, lack of time for discussion in consultative bodies, lack of information and lack of capacity (people, time, resources) for greater development of patient organizations. Respondents have identified barriers as the socio-economic situation, lack of capacity for macro-level involvement, mental health constraints or...
|
Page generated in 0.1085 seconds