Spelling suggestions: "subject:"ovarian neoplasias -- genetics.""
1 |
Characterization of genetic alterations in ovarian cancer associated with chemotherapy response /Österberg, Lovisa, January 2009 (has links)
Diss. (sammanfattning) Göteborg : Göteborgs universitet, 2009. / Härtill 4 uppsatser.
|
2 |
Gene expression profiling of ovarian cancer.January 2005 (has links)
Wong Wai Yin. / Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2005. / Includes bibliographical references. / Abstracts in English and Chinese. / Acknowledgement --- p.i / Abstract --- p.iii / Abbreviation --- p.vii / Chapter CHAPTER 1 --- INTRODUCTION --- p.1-1 / Chapter 1.1 --- Classification of common epithelial ovarian tumors --- p.1-2 / Chapter 1.1.1 --- Serous tumors --- p.1-4 / Chapter 1.1.2 --- Mucinous tumors --- p.1-5 / Chapter 1.1.3 --- Endometrioid tumors --- p.1-6 / Chapter 1.1.4 --- Clear cell tumors --- p.1-6 / Chapter 1.1.5 --- Cancer staging --- p.1-7 / Chapter 1.1.6 --- Tumor grading --- p.1-8 / Chapter 1.2 --- Etiology --- p.1-10 / Chapter 1.2.1 --- Factors associated with increased risks --- p.1-10 / Chapter 1.2.2 --- Factors associated with decreased risks --- p.1-12 / Chapter 1.2.3 --- Other factors --- p.1-13 / Chapter 1.3 --- Understanding of progression of ovarian carcinoma --- p.1-13 / Chapter 1.4 --- Current screening test for ovarian cancer --- p.1-15 / Chapter 1.4.1 --- Transvaginal utrasound --- p.1-15 / Chapter 1.4.2 --- Serum tumor markers --- p.1-16 / Chapter 1.5 --- Molecular basis of ovarian cancer --- p.1-18 / Chapter 1.5.1 --- Loss of heterozygosity --- p.1-18 / Chapter 1.5.2 --- Microsatellite instability --- p.1-19 / Chapter 1.5.3 --- Oncogenes --- p.1-19 / Chapter 1.5.4 --- Tumor suppressor genes --- p.1-21 / Chapter 1.6 --- Microarray gene expression profiling analysis --- p.1-25 / Chapter 1.6.1 --- Princeple of DNA micorarray --- p.1-26 / Chapter 1.6.2 --- Types of microarray --- p.1-29 / Chapter 1.7 --- Gene expression profiling of ovarian cancer --- p.1-29 / Chapter 1.7.1 --- Up-regulated genes in ovarian cancer --- p.1-30 / Chapter 1.7.2 --- Down-regulated genes in ovarian cancer --- p.1-32 / Chapter 1.8 --- Project aims --- p.1-35 / Chapter CHPATER 2 --- MATERIALS AND METHODS --- p.2-1 / Chapter 2.1 --- Materials --- p.2-1 / Chapter 2.1.1 --- Patients --- p.2-1 / Chapter 2.1.2 --- Ovarian tissue specimen --- p.2-1 / Chapter 2.2 --- Methods --- p.2-2 / Chapter 2.2.1 --- Preparation of OCT-embedded Specimen Sections --- p.2-2 / Chapter 2.2.2 --- Microdissection of Tumor Cells from Specimen Sections --- p.2-3 / Chapter 2.2.3 --- Disruption of normal ovarian frozen tissue --- p.2-3 / Chapter 2.2.4 --- Total RNA Extraction --- p.2-3 / Chapter 2.2.4.1 --- RNA Isolation --- p.2-4 / Chapter 2.2.4.2 --- DNase I Digestion --- p.2-4 / Chapter 2.2.4.3 --- RNA Cleanup and Elution --- p.2-5 / Chapter 2.2.5 --- Oligonucleotide Microarray --- p.2-6 / Chapter 2.2.5.1 --- Two-Cycle cDNA Synthesis --- p.2-6 / Chapter 2.2.5.2 --- Synthesis of Biotin-Labeled cRNA --- p.2-9 / Chapter 2.2.5.3 --- Fragmenting the cRNA for Target Preparation --- p.2-9 / Chapter 2.2.5.4 --- Target Hybridization --- p.2-10 / Chapter 2.2.5.5 --- "Array Washing, Staining, and Scanning" --- p.2-11 / Chapter 2.2.5.6 --- Statistical Analysis of Microarray Data --- p.2-11 / Chapter 2.2.6 --- Quantitative Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction --- p.2-13 / Chapter 2.2.6.1 --- Primer and Probe --- p.2-13 / Chapter 2.2.6.2 --- Reverse-transcription --- p.2-13 / Chapter 2.2.6.3 --- Plate Setup --- p.2-14 / Chapter 2.2.6.4 --- Fluocogenic PCR --- p.2-14 / Chapter 2.2.6.5 --- Statistical Analysis of Quantitative Real-time PCR Data --- p.2-15 / Chapter CHAPTER 3 --- RESULTS --- p.3-1 / Chapter 3.1 --- Microarray gene expression data analysis --- p.3-1 / Chapter 3.1.1 --- Unsupervised Gene Selection --- p.3-1 / Chapter 3.1.2 --- Supervised Gene Selection --- p.3-3 / Chapter 3.1.2.1 --- Gene expression profiles distinguish Serous Epithelial Ovarian Tumor from Normal Ovary and identifydifferentially expressed genes --- p.3-3 / Chapter 3.1.2.2 --- Gene expression profiles distinguish Advanced Stage Serous Epithelial Ovarian Tumor from Early Stage Serous Epithelial Ovarian Tumor and identify differentially expressed genes --- p.3-22 / Chapter 3.1.2.3 --- Gene expression profiles distinguish Metastatic Serous Epithelial Ovarian Tumor from Primary Serous Epithelial Ovarian Tumor and identify differentially expressed genes --- p.3-24 / Chapter 3.2 --- Validation of microarray data by quantitative Real-time PCR --- p.3-27 / Chapter 3.2.1 --- Fold change of candidate genes --- p.3-27 / Chapter 3.2.2 --- Correlation between microarray and quantitative real-time PCR results --- p.3-29 / Chapter 3.2.3 --- Comparison of the expression of candidates genes among the different histological types of epithelial ovarian tumors --- p.3-32 / Chapter CHAPTER 4 --- DISCUSSION --- p.4-1 / Chapter 4.1 --- Global gene expression profiling using oligonucleotide microarray --- p.4-1 / Chapter 4.1.1 --- "Sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility of the Affymetrix GeneChip® microarray" --- p.4-1 / Chapter 4.1.2 --- Microarray analysis software --- p.4-3 / Chapter 4.1.2.1 --- DNA-Chip Analyzer software --- p.4-3 / Chapter 4.1.2.2 --- Comparison of statistical methods for analysis of Affymetrix GeneChip® microarray data --- p.4-5 / Chapter 4.2 --- Validation of microarray data --- p.4-7 / Chapter 4.2.1 --- Advantages of using real-time PCR for mRNA quantification --- p.4-8 / Chapter 4.2.2 --- Comparison of mRNA gene expression by RT-PCR and DNA microarray --- p.4-9 / Chapter 4.3 --- Gene expression profiling in serous ovarian cancer compared with normal ovarian epithelium --- p.4-10 / Chapter 4.3.1 --- Potential biomarkers or therapeutic targets in ovarian cancer --- p.4-12 / Chapter 4.4 --- Gene expression profiling in advanced serous ovarian cancer compared with early ovarian cancer --- p.4-16 / Chapter 4.4.1 --- Potential prognostic markers or therapeutic targets in advanced ovarian cancer --- p.4-17 / Chapter 4.5 --- Gene expression profiling in metastatic cancer compared with primary ovarian cancer --- p.4-22 / Chapter 4.5.1 --- Potential predictive markers or therapeutic targets in metastatic cancer of ovary origin --- p.4-23 / Chapter CHAPTER 5 --- CONCLUSIONS --- p.5-1 / Chapter CHAPTER 6 --- FUTURE PROSPECT --- p.6-1 / REFERENCES --- p.R-1
|
3 |
Physical and functional evidence in support of candidate chromosome 3p tumour suppressor genes implicated in epithelial ovarian cancerCody, Neal A. L., 1980- January 2008 (has links)
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is difficult to detect in early stage disease, resulting in a high mortality rate. The molecular events underlying EOC development remain largely unknown. Chromosome 3 exhibits frequent deletions and rearrangements in EOC by cytogenetic analysis. In addition, loss of heterozygosity (LOH) mapping of matched ovarian tumour and constitutional DNA samples exhibits specific regions of chromosome 3 loss involving distinct regions: 3p25-p26, 3p24 and a region proximal to 3p14. Thus, chromosome 3p loss points to the location of tumour suppressor genes (TSG) implicated in tumourigenesis, based on Knudson's 'two-hit' model and the paradigm of the classical TSG. The dissertation hypothesis states at least one TSG implicated in EOC is located on chromosome 3p. A novel complementation approach based on the transfer of normal chromosome 3 fragments into OV-90, a tumourigenic EOC cell line harbouring LOH of the 3p arm, was used to generate functional evidence for chromosome 3p TSGs. Three hybrids exhibited complete suppression of tumourigenic potential based on the inability to form colonies in soft agarose, spheroids in cell culture, and tumours in nude mice xenograft models. While all hybrids had acquired various chromosome 3 regions, they all shared in common a 3p12-pcen interval, suggesting at least one common gene may have affected the suppression of tumourigenicity in the OV-90-derived hybrids. Twelve known/hypothetical genes mapping to 3p12-pcen region were characterized based on gene expression and mutation analysis following a classical model for TSG inactivation. To establish the relevance to EOC, gene expression of candidates was investigated in primary cultures of normal ovarian surface epithelial cells and both malignant serous and benign serous tumour samples. The gene expression and genetic analysis identified seven TSG candidates, none of which appeared to be mutated or transcriptionally silenced based on classical mechanisms of TSG inactivation in OV-90, thus suppression of tumourigenicity may have resulted from the functional complementation of one more haploinsufficient 3p12-pcen genes. Several genes (GBE1, VGLL3, ZNF654 ) appeared underexpressed in malignant tumours and these findings suggest the intriguing possibility that more than one 3p12-pcen gene was involved in the suppression of tumourigenicity in OV-90, and by extension, EOC.
|
4 |
Physical and functional evidence in support of candidate chromosome 3p tumour suppressor genes implicated in epithelial ovarian cancerCody, Neal A. L., 1980- January 2008 (has links)
No description available.
|
5 |
Gene expression patterns in human ovarian cancer and mouse embryos.January 1997 (has links)
by Cheung Kwok Kuen. / Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 1997. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 111-130). / Chapter Chapter 1 --- General introduction of human ovarian cancer / Chapter 1.1 --- Epidemiology --- p.1 / Chapter 1.2 --- Symptoms and diagnosis --- p.4 / Chapter 1.3 --- Etiology --- p.5 / Chapter 1.3.1 --- Factors associated with decreased risks --- p.6 / Chapter 1.3.2 --- Factors associated with increased risks --- p.8 / Chapter 1.4 --- Classification of ovarian cancer --- p.12 / Chapter 1.5 --- Molecular basis of ovarian cancer --- p.18 / Chapter 1.6 --- Project aim --- p.29 / Chapter Chaper 2 --- "DOC-2, a differentially expressed gene in human ovarian cancer" / Chapter 2.1 --- Introduction --- p.32 / Chapter 2.2 --- Materials and Methods --- p.35 / Chapter 2.2.1 --- Expression of DOC-2 in human ovarian tissues --- p.35 / Chapter 2.2.1.1 --- Preparation of specimen --- p.35 / Chapter 2.2.1.2 --- Immunohistochemical studies of the expression of DOC-2 protein in human ovarian tissues --- p.35 / Chapter 2.2.1.3 --- Quantitation of immunoreactivity --- p.38 / Chapter 2.2.2 --- Effect of DOC-2 transfection on growth rate of the ovarian cancer cell lineSKOV3 --- p.39 / Chapter 2.2.2.1 --- Cell line --- p.39 / Chapter 2.2.2.2 --- Transfection of DOC-2 to SKOV3 ovarian carcinoma cell line --- p.39 / Chapter 2.2.2.3 --- Growth curve of the transfected ovarian carcinoma cell lines --- p.40 / Chapter 2.2.3 --- In vivo tumorigenicity study --- p.42 / Chapter 2.3 --- Results --- p.44 / Chapter 2.3.1 --- Expression of DOC-2 in human ovarian tissues --- p.44 / Chapter 2.3.2 --- Effects of DOC-2 transfected gene on the growth rate of the human ovarian cancer cell line SKOV3 --- p.46 / Chapter 2.3.2.1 --- Standard curves for calculating cell density from absorbance --- p.46 / Chapter 2.3.2.2 --- The effect of DOC-2 transfection on the growth rate of the human ovarian cancer cell line SKOV3 --- p.47 / Chapter 2.3.3 --- In vivo tumorigenicity --- p.48 / Chapter 2.4 --- Discussion --- p.50 / Chapter Chapter 3 --- DOC-2 expression in mouse embryonic development / Chapter 3.1 --- Introduction --- p.56 / Chapter 3.2 --- Materials and Methods --- p.60 / Chapter 3.2.1 --- Expression of murine homolog of DOC-2 (p96) during mouse embryonic development --- p.60 / Chapter 3.2.1.1 --- Preparation of paraffin-embedded mouse embryo sections --- p.60 / Chapter 3.2.1.2 --- Preparation of OCT-embedded mouse embryo sections --- p.61 / Chapter 3.2.1.3 --- Immunohistochemistry of murine homolog of DOC-2 (p96) on mouse embryos --- p.61 / Chapter 3.2.2 --- Effect of antibody blocking for DOC-2 protein on the growth of embryonic kidney in vitro --- p.62 / Chapter 3.3 --- Results --- p.64 / Chapter 3.4 --- Discussion --- p.69 / Chapter Chapter 4 --- Apoptosis / Chapter 4.1 --- Introduction --- p.72 / Chapter 4.1.1 --- Current methods for the detection of apoptosis --- p.74 / Chapter 4.1.1.1 --- Agarose gel electrophoresis --- p.75 / Chapter 4.1.1.2 --- Flow cytometric analysis --- p.76 / Chapter 4.1.1.3 --- 3-OH end labelling --- p.77 / Chapter 4.1.1.4 --- Nuclease assay --- p.78 / Chapter 4.1.2 --- Apoptosis in normal physiology and oncogenesis --- p.78 / Chapter 4.1.3 --- p53 and apoptosis --- p.80 / Chapter 4.1.4 --- bcl-2 and apoptosis --- p.83 / Chapter 4.2 --- Materials and Methods --- p.92 / Chapter 4.2.1 --- Expression of p53 and bcl-2 in human ovarian tissues --- p.92 / Chapter 4.2.1.1 --- Preparation of specimens --- p.92 / Chapter 4.2.1.2 --- Immunohistochemical studies of the expression of p53 and bcl-2 proteins in ovarian tissue --- p.92 / Chapter 4.2.2 --- In stiu terminal transferase-mediated dUTP nick and labelling (TUNEL) --- p.94 / Chapter 4.3 --- Results --- p.96 / Chapter 4.3.1 --- Expression of p53 and bcl-2 in human ovarian tissues --- p.96 / Chapter 4.3.2 --- Apoptosis in human ovarian tissues --- p.99 / Chapter 4.4 --- Discussion --- p.101 / Chapter Chapter 5 --- Concluding Remarks --- p.108 / References --- p.111 / Appendix --- p.131 / Figures and legend --- p.138
|
6 |
Expression analysis of the 3p25.3-ptelomere genes in epithelial ovarian cancerRossiny, Vanessa Delphine. January 2008 (has links)
Microarray expression analysis was carried out to identify genes with a role in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The U133A Affymetrix GeneChipRTM was used to determine the expression patterns of the 3p25.3-ptel genes represented on the microarray in 14 primary cultures of normal ovarian surface epithelial (NOSE) samples, 25 frozen malignant ovarian tumor samples and four EOC cell lines. Seven genes with differential expression patterns in the tumor samples compared to the NOSE samples were identified as candidates for further analysis, starting with ARPC4, SRGAP3 and ATP2B2. Although none of the candidates had been previously studied in ovarian cancer, several had either family or pathway members that had. Expression patterns seemed unaffected by either tumor histopathological subtype or the allelic imbalances observed with loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analysis. The absence of association with genomic context suggested that differential expression was the result of transcriptional regulation rather than direct targeting.
|
7 |
Expression analysis of the 3p25.3-ptelomere genes in epithelial ovarian cancerRossiny, Vanessa Delphine. January 2008 (has links)
No description available.
|
Page generated in 0.1028 seconds