O presente estudo analisa como as demandas institucionais e as regras do cárcere afetam e conformam o indivíduo preso. O processo de prisionização implica na absorção de valores, costumes e normas próprias da cultura prisional; a apropriação das regras, dos códigos de linguagem e dos conhecimentos desse grupo social específico traz impactos à identidade do preso. A partir do conjunto de normas que regem o dia-a-dia prisional - que inclui aquelas produzidas pelo Estado (ordem formal), as elaboradas pelos próprios presos (ordem informal) e mesmo as disciplinas (enquanto poder normativo fundamental à manutenção dessas duas ordens) - pode-se compreender qual o tipo de individualidade essas regras pretendem produzir e as diferentes formas do indivíduo reagir a tais exigências institucionais. / This study examines how the institutional demands and the rules of the jail affect and conform the inmate man. The process of prisonization implies the absorption of values, habits and standards proper of prison culture; the appropriation of the norms, codes of language and knowledge of this specific social group brings impacts to the identity of the prisoner. From the set of rules governing the day-to-day prison - including those produced by the State (formal order), as elaborated by the prisoners (informal order) and even the disciplines (as normative power essential to the maintenance of these two orders) - one can understand what kind of individuality these rules aim to produce and the different ways of the individual reacting to such institutional requirements.

O presente estudo analisa como as demandas institucionais e as regras do cárcere afetam e conformam o indivíduo preso. O processo de prisionização implica na absorção de valores, costumes e normas próprias da cultura prisional; a apropriação das regras, dos códigos de linguagem e dos conhecimentos desse grupo social específico traz impactos à identidade do preso. A partir do conjunto de normas que regem o dia-a-dia prisional - que inclui aquelas produzidas pelo Estado (ordem formal), as elaboradas pelos próprios presos (ordem informal) e mesmo as disciplinas (enquanto poder normativo fundamental à manutenção dessas duas ordens) - pode-se compreender qual o tipo de individualidade essas regras pretendem produzir e as diferentes formas do indivíduo reagir a tais exigências institucionais. / This study examines how the institutional demands and the rules of the jail affect and conform the inmate man. The process of prisonization implies the absorption of values, habits and standards proper of prison culture; the appropriation of the norms, codes of language and knowledge of this specific social group brings impacts to the identity of the prisoner. From the set of rules governing the day-to-day prison - including those produced by the State (formal order), as elaborated by the prisoners (informal order) and even the disciplines (as normative power essential to the maintenance of these two orders) - one can understand what kind of individuality these rules aim to produce and the different ways of the individual reacting to such institutional requirements.

L'adage ne bis in idem déjà connu du droit romain est utilisé en procédure pénale, il a pour signification que nul ne peut être poursuivi deux fois pour les mêmes faits. Cette règle a pour objectif de garantir la protection des libertés individuelles notamment, la sécurité juridique et l'équité. En droit français, il est prévu à l’article 368 du code de procédure pénale que « aucune personne acquittée légalement ne peut plus être reprise ou accusée à raison des mêmes faits, même sous une qualification différente ». Ne bis in idem possède un édifice tridimensionnel déterminant le non-cumul des qualifications, des poursuites et des sanctions. Concernant l'aspect européen, le principe a été soumis par la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme a d'importants critères permettant de déterminer si l'on se trouve en situation de cumul des sanctions. La Cour européenne des droits de l'homme a amorcé un changement dans l'interprétation française du cumul des sanctions. Le Conseil constitutionnel, prenant en considération la position de la haute cour européenne, a donné un nouveau tournant à la règle française. Un processus s'est alors engagé vers la refonte du champ d'application permettant d'étendre la règle à de nombreuses situations de cumuls et notamment aux sanctions disciplinaires. C'est en faisant application d'une jurisprudence évolutive et abondante que nous nous attacherons à démontrer que la règle pourrait également s'appliquer à certaines sanctions disciplinaires qui peuvent également être cumulées aux sanctions pénales / The adage ne bis in idem already known from Roman law is used in criminal proceedings, it means that no one can be prosecuted twice for the same facts. The purpose of this rule is to guarantee the protection of individual freedoms, including legal certainty and fairness. Under French law, article 368 of the code of criminal procedure provides that "no person who has been acquitted by law may be taken back or charged on the basis of the same facts, even under a different qualification". Ne bis in idem has a three-dimensional building determining the non-cumulation of qualifications, prosecutions and sanctions. Regarding the European aspect, the principle has been submitted by the European court of human rights has important criteria to determine if there is a situation of cumulation of sanctions. The European court of human rights has initiated a change in the French interpretation of the cumulation of sanctions. The Constitutional Council, taking into account the position of the High European court, has given a new turn to the French rule. A process has begun to redefine the scope of application to extend the rule to many cumulative situations including disciplinary sanctions. It is by applying an evolutionary and abundant jurisprudence that we will endeavor to demonstrate that the rule could also apply to certain disciplinary sanctions which can also be cumulated with the penal sanctions