Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Washington, 2006. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 84-92).

No description available.

No description available.

Several mechanisms have been proposed for the pol I transcript termination in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Two well known models are “Pause and Release” and “Torpedo”. Each mechanism explains the role of some of the cis- and trans-factors in transcript termination and the eventual maturation of the ribosomal RNA, but neither mechanism can explain all the experimental observations. A recent study has suggested that each of the two mechanisms can terminate the pol I transcription independently but with significantly less efficiency than the presence of both mechanisms. To help clarify the reasons for the discrepancies in these data, in this study the suggested mechanisms were examined further in three areas by using alternative techniques. First, the effect of uracil concentration or selection times on the transformation frequency of alternative 3’external transcribed spacer (3’ETS) constructs were assessed. Consistent with the previous results a construct containing the full 3’ETS showed the higher transformation frequencies compared with a construct containing only the hairpin or only the termination sites. However, results showed neither the uracil concentration nor selection times have a significant effect on the transformation frequency. Second, to further confirm the “pause and release” mechanism, the termination sites identified by S1 nuclease studies were analyzed using ligation-mediated RT-PCR. The 3’ terminus of the mature 25S rRNA was demonstrated readily but, unexpectedly, the 3’termini of the 3’ETS precursor molecules were not detected, possibly because of their specific structure. Finally, the 3’ extended rRNA precursors were studied by semi-quantitative RT-PCR. These appeared not to correspond with past nuclease protection analyses nor did they demonstrate downstream exonuclease function, observations which question our current understanding of Pol I transcript termination.

Die halbmaximale (Proliferations-) inhibitorische Konzentration (IC50) vom RNA-Polymerase I-Inhibitor CX-5461 liegt für die getesteten sieben humanen kolorektalen Karzinomzell¬linien zwischen 0,7 und 3,1 µmol/L, für nicht-transformierte Fibroblasten bei 8,1 µmol/L. Der deutlich stärkere antiproliferative Effekt von CX-5461 auf Tumorzellen lässt somit ein mögliches therapeutisches Fenster erkennen. CX-5461 (1 µmol/L und weniger) induziert einen persistierenden Zellzyklus-arretierten Zellphänotyp mit Seneszenz-assoziierter (SA) -Galaktosidase-Aktivität (SA-β-Gal). Die durch CX-5461 ausgelöste verringerte Synthese ribosomaler RNA (rRNA)-Transkripte im Nucleolus, ein Subkompartiment des Nucleus, in dem die Transkription der ribosomalen DNA und Bildung von Prä-Ribosomen stattfinden, hat eine Störung der Ribosomen¬biogenese zur Folge. Diese als nucleolärer Stress bezeichnete Situation ist mit zahlreichen Einzelphänomen assoziiert wie der Akkumulation ribosomaler Proteine aufgrund eines durch CX-5461 verursachten Missverhältnisses bei der Synthese ribosomaler Proteine und rRNAs. Auch kommt es bei nucleolärem Stress zur Aktivierung Zellzykusarrest-führender Signalwege vermittelt durch DNA-Damage-Response, p53 und Retinoblastom (Rb). Die durch CX-5461 induzieren seneszenten Zellen lassen sich durch Kombination mit dem Bcl-Inhibitor und Senotlytikum Navitoclax in Apoptose überführen. Das kombinierte Strategiekonzept demonstriert, dass der pro-proliferative Phänotyp von Tumorzellen mit CX-5461 durch Induktion von Seneszenz effektiv gestoppt werden kann, um anschließend diese Zellen mit dem Bcl-Inhibitor Navitoclax gezielt in Apoptose zu überführen. Der durch CX-5461 ausgelöste seneszente Zellphänotyp zeigt sich sensitiv gegenüber dem Apoptose-auslösenden Effekt von Navitoclax – im Ggs. zu nicht-seneszenten Zellen. Basierend auf diesem Konzept deutet sich eine potentielle neue Strategie für eine Tumortherapie an, deren Grundlage die kombinierte Adressierung der beiden antiproliferativen Phänomene Seneszenz und Apoptose in soliden Tumorzellen wie dem kolorektalen Karzinom darstellt. / The antiproliferative effects of CX-5461, a RNA Polymerase I (Pol I) inhibitor, measured as half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50-value) in seven human colorectal cancer cell lines, ranged between IC50=0.7 µmol/L and IC50=3.1 µmol/L CX-5461. In contrast, non-transformed fibroblast control cells demonstrated an IC50-value of 8.1 µmol/L. This difference in IC50 values between tumor cells and normal cells that demonstrate a stronger antiproliferative effect of CX-5461 in tumor cells may open a relevant therapeutic window. CX-5461 induced a persistent state of cell-cycle-arrested cells with senescence-associated (SA) -Galactosidase positivity. CX-5461 negatively influences the ribosome biogenesis that takes place in the nucleolus, a nuclear sub-compartment and the cellular site of transcription of ribosomal DNA and pre-ribosome formation. CX-5461 mediated deficient ribosome biogenesis due to a mismatch of reduced ribosomal RNA (rRNA) synthesis and ribosomal protein synthesis caused nucleolar stress. A nucleolar stress response led to different molecular phenomena within the cell. For CX-5461 induced nucleolar stress, main sequences were the accumulation of ribosomal proteins within the nucleolus and activation of different signal pathways involved in the induction of cell cycle arrest mediated by DNA Damage Response (DDR) signals as well as p53 and retinoblastoma (Rb) dependent pathways. The antiproliferative effects of CX-5461 were enhanced using the pro-apoptotic Bcl-inhibitor and senolytic Navitoclax, inducing apoptosis in the tumor cells. The cellular senescent phenotype as consequence of RNA Pol I inhibition by CX-5461 was sensitive to the pro-apoptotic Navitoclax in contrast to non-senescent cells. The results of this thesis confirm a perspective for an anti-tumor-specific therapeutic strategy addressing the two antiproliferative phenomena senescence and apoptosis in solid tumor cells like the colorectal carcinoma.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Virginia, 2008. / Includes bibliographical references. Also available online through Digital Dissertations.

Transcription of the ribosomal genes accounts for the majority of transcription in the cell due to the constant high demand for ribosomes. The number of proteins synthesized correlates with an effective ribosomal biogenesis, which is regulated by cell growth and proliferation. In the work presented in this thesis, we have investigated the ribosomal RNA genes 45S and 5S rRNA, which are transcribed by RNA Pol I and RNA Pol III, respectively. The focus of this work is the chromatin remodelling complex B-WICH, which is composed of WSTF, the ATPase SNF2h and NM1. We have studied in particular its role in ribosomal gene transcription. We showed in Study I that B-WICH is required to set the stage at rRNA gene promoters by remodelling the chromatin into an open, transcriptionally active configuration. This results in the binding of histone acetyl transferases to the genes and subsequent histone acetylation, which is needed for ribosomal gene activation. Study II investigated the role of B-WICH in transcription mediated by RNA polymerase III. We showed that B-WICH is essential to create an accessible chromatin atmosphere at 5S rRNA genes, which is compatible with the results obtained in Study 1. In this case, however, B-WICH operates as a licensing factor for c-Myc and the Myc/Max/Mxd network. Study III confirmed the importance and the function of the B-WICH complex as an activator of ribosomal genes. We demonstrated that B-WICH is important for the remodelling of the rDNA chromatin into an active, competent state in response to extracellular stimuli, and that the association of the B-WICH complex to the rRNA gene promoter is regulated by proliferative and metabolic changes in cells. The work presented in this thesis has confirmed that the B-WICH complex is an important regulator and activator of Pol I and Pol III transcription. We conclude that B-WICH is essential for remodelling the rDNA chromatin into a transcriptionally active state, as required for efficient ribosomal gene transcription. / <p>At the time of the doctoral defense, the following papers were unpublished and had a status as follows: Paper 2: Manuscript. Paper 3: Manuscript.</p><p> </p>

Dans les cellules eucaryotes, il existe 3 ARN Polymérases nucléaires (Pol I, II et III), chacune ayant une fonction de synthèse d'ARN qui lui est propre. L'ARN polymérase I (Pol I) est responsable de la synthèse du précurseur des grands ARN ribosomiques (ARNr), ce qui correspond à une activité de transcription massive dans la cellule. Des données structurales sur cette enzyme de 14 sous-unités sont disponibles. Ceci permet une meilleure compréhension de son mode de fonctionnement, et a confirmé que l'ARN Pol I possède 3 sous-unités spécifiques, aussi appelées "Built-in Transcription Factors", responsables d'activités régulatrices. Deux d'entres elles, Rpa49 / Rpa34, forment un hétérodimère structuralement proche des facteurs de transcription TFIIF et TFIIE de la Pol II, impliqués tant dans l'initiation que dans l'élongation de la transcription. La dernière, Rpa12, est connue pour avoir un rôle dans la stabilité de l'ARN Pol I et l'activité de clivage du transcrit de la polymérase en cours de pause (via son extrémité C-terminale), comme son homologue TFIIS, facteur de transcription de l'ARN Pol II. Nous avons effectué des études génétiques sur des mutants de l'ARN Pol I dépourvus de la sous-unité Rpa49 (rpa49Δ). Cette délétion est viable mais entraîne des problèmes d'initiation et élongation. Nous étudions dans ce travail le clonage et la caractérisation de "suppresseurs" extragéniques correspondant à des mutations ponctuelles de trois sous-unité de la Pol I qui rétablissent une synthèse d'ARNr en l'absence de la sous-unité Rpa49. Toutes ces mutations suppressives identifiées ont été localisées premièrement dans les deux grandes sous-unités Rpa190 et Rpa135, structuralement très proches de Rpa12, mais également au sein même de Rpa12, indiquant une possible interaction entre les sous-unités Rpa49 et Rpa12 ou la région autour. Notamment, un élément spécifique de l'ARN Pol I dans Rpa190, le "DNA Mimicking Loop", est structuralement très proche de la région où l'on trouve ces mutations suppresseur. Les caractérisations génétiques, structurales, mais aussi biochimiques et fonctionnelles de ces suppresseurs nous permettent de proposer des hypothèses sur les rôles de Rpa49 et de Rpa12, mais aussi de cette petite région de Rpa190, en l'initiation de la transcription, ce qui n'a jamais été mis en évidence auparavant. / In eukaryotes cells, there are 3 nuclear RNA Polymerases (Pol I, II and III), each having a particular RNA synthesis function. The RNA Polymerase I (Pol I) produces a single transcript: the precursor of the large ribosomal RNA (rRNA), which correspond to a massive transcription activity in the cell. Structural data of this 14-subunits enzyme is now available. This allows a better understanding of its operating mode, and confirmed that the Pol I has 3 specific subunits, also called "Built-in transcription factors", capable of regulatory activities. Two of them, Rpa49/Rpa34, are forming a heterodimer structurally related to the Pol II transcription factors TFIIF and TFIIE, implicated in both initiation and elongation of the transcription. The last one, Rpa12, is known to have a role in Pol I stability and the cleavage activity of the paused Pol I (via its C-terminus part), like its homologous TFIIS in the Pol II. We performed extensive genetic studies of Pol I mutants lacking one of these subunits: Rpa49 (rpa49Δ). This depletion is viable, but results in initiation and elongation problems. Here, we report the cloning and characterization of extragenic suppressors mapping point mutations in three subunits of Pol I restoring efficient Pol I activities in absence of Rpa49. All suppressor mutations identified were structurally mapped firstly in the two largest subunits Rpa190 and Rpa135 very closed to Rpa12, and then in Rpa12 itself, indicating a possible interplay between the Rpa49 and Rpa12 subunits, and the area around. Notably, a RNA pol I specific element in Rpa190, called "DNA Mimicking Loop", is structurally very closed to the region in which we find all of our suppressor mutations. The genetic, structural but also biochemical and functional characterizations of these suppressors allow us to propose roles of these Rpa49 and Rpa12 subunits, but also of the small area of Rpa190, which has never been highlighted before.

RNR Polymerase I (RNA Pol I) is a “factory” that orchestrate the transcription of ribosomal rRNA for constructing ribosomes as a primary workshop for protein translation to sustain cell growth. Misregulation of RNA Pol I can cause uncontrolled cell proliferation, which leads to the development of cancer. Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) is a valuable model system to study RNA Pol I. Recently, the X-ray crystal structure of the yeast homologue of RNA Pol I was elucidated, offering the structural basis to selectively target this transcriptional machinery. The approach to selective RNA Pol I targeting was to disrupt the interaction between a specific transcription factor, RRN3 that bind distinct regions of RNA Pol I. For this purpose, a recombined plasmid was designed to carry human rDNA plus its promoter as target together with a selection marker gene. Therefore, this plasmid could not only introduce the target gene into the yeast (host), but also facilitate the passage of this target gene into a stable yeast strain. In this project, one uracil deficient yeast strain of YBR140C was transformed with the recombined yeast integrative plasmid of pHmrDNA-YIPlac211-TG1. This is a recombined plasmid containing not only the human rDNA but also the URA3 gene as a selection marker. PCR amplification of the human ribosomal DNA was indicative of successful integration of the human ribosomal DNA into the genome of the two yeast strains. Virtual screening using a library of 700 FDA-approved compounds was docked into the RRN3-RNA Pol I complex to identify small molecule disruptors of the RRN3-RNA Pol I as a selective strategy. Using growth assays, gel electrophoresis and transcriptional assays, we identified cerivastatin sodium as a lead virtual hit. The result implicates cerivastatin sodium as a selective RNA Pol I inhibitor worthy of further development with potential as targeted anticancer therapeutic.

In der vorliegenden Arbeit wurden Fusionsprodukte aus verschiedenen nukleolären Proteinen mit fluoreszierenden Proteinen (GFP und dsRed: rot fluoreszierendes Protein) in lebenden Zellen von Säugern und Xenopus laevis exprimiert und lokalisiert. Dadurch standen "Marker" für die drei Hauptkomponenten des Nukleolus zur Verfügung. Die dynamischen Eigenschaften dieser Fusionsproteine wurden quantitativ mit Hilfe von "Photobleaching"-Experimenten analysiert (FRAP: fluorescence recovery after photobleaching). Im einzelnen wurde durch die Untersuchung von RNA-Polymerase I der rDNA Transkriptionsort im fibrillären Zentrum des Nukleolus bestätigt. Die kinetischen Analysen von zwei pol I-Untereinheiten (RPA194 und RPA53) durch FRAP in transkriptionell aktiven und inaktiven Nukleoli erlaubten direkte Rückschlüsse auf die Transkriptionsdauer der rRNA-Gene in vivo. Die individuellen pol I-Untereinheiten bewegen sich rasch zwischen Nukleoplasma und Nukleolus und interagieren in den fibrillären Zentren mit dem rDNA-Promoter. Dann werden sie in produktive Transkriptionskomplexe integriert, die während der Elongationsphase, die bei Raumtemperatur etwa fünf Minuten dauert, stabil bleiben und erst nach der Termination dissoziieren. Zumindest ein Teil der Untereinheiten wandert anschließend in das Nukleoplasma. Die Ergebnisse widersprechen Modellen, welche die dichte fibrilläre Komponente als Transkriptionsort ansehen oder immobile RNA Polymerase I-Moleküle postulieren. Die Identifizierung des fibrillären Zentrums als rDNA-Transkriptionsort wurde durch die Koexpression der pol I-Untereinheiten mit Fibrillarin, einem Leitprotein der dichten fibrillären Komponente, ermöglicht. Durch die Expression der beiden Proteine als unterschiedlich fluoreszierende Fusionsproteine konnten die Orte der Transkription (die fibrillären Zentren) und die Orte der ersten Prozessierungsschritte, an denen Fibrillarin beteiligt ist (die dichte fibrilläre Komponente), in lebenden Zellen als direkt benachbarte, aber räumlich getrennte Kompartimente identifiziert werden. Die Rolle der granulären Komponente als Ort späterer Prozessierungschritte und Integration ribosomaler Proteine wurde durch die Expression von B23 und der ribosomalen Proteine L4, L5 und L10 verdeutlicht. Dabei wurde die nukleoläre Lokalisation von L10 erstmals belegt. In der Literatur wurde bisher angenommen, L10 würde erst im Cytoplasma mit Ribosomen assoziieren. Dies ist nicht der Fall, wie insbesondere Experimente mit Leptomycin B gezeigt haben. Diese Droge hemmt den CRM1-abhängigen Kernexport und führte zu einer deutlichen Akkumulation von L10-haltigen Präribosomen im Nukleoplasma von menschlichen Zellen. Schließlich sollte ein neues nukleoläres Protein von Xenopus laevis molekular charakterisiert werden, das mit verschiedenen Antikörpern in der granulären Komponente des Nukleolus lokalisiert wurde. Durch massenspektrometrische Analysen nach zweidimensionaler Gelelektrophorese wurden die Antigene überraschenderweise als Cytokeratin-Homologe identifiziert. Im Verlauf dieser Arbeit wurden drei bisher unveröffentlichte Cytokeratin 19 Isoformen von Xenopus kloniert, sequenziert und als GFP-Fusionsproteine exprimiert. Diese wurden allerdings wie reguläre Cytokeratine in cytoplasmatische Intermediärfilamente integriert und konnten, auch nach Translokation in den Zellkern durch ein experimentell eingefügtes Lokalisationssignal, nicht im Nukleolus nachgewiesen werden. Nach der Kotransfektion mit verschiedenen Zellkern-Proteinen wurde Cytokeratin 19 mit diesen in den Zellkern und mit nukleolären Proteinen in den Nukleolus transportiert. Obwohl diese Versuche auf einen "Huckepack"-Transportmechanismus für ein normalerweise cytoplasmatisches Protein hinweisen, konnte Cytokeratin 19 nicht spezifisch in der granulären Komponente des Nukleolus lokalisiert werden. Daher konnte bisher, trotz intensiver Bemühungen, die Identität des in der Immunfluoreszenz nachgewiesenen nukleolären Proteins leider nicht aufgeklärt werden. / In the present work, nucleolar proteins were expressed as fusions with fluorescent proteins (GFP: green fluorescent protein or dsRed: red fluorescent protein) in living mammalian and Xenopus laevis cells. These tagged proteins were used as markers for the three main components of the nucleolus. The dynamic properties of the fusion proteins were analyzed quantitatively in photobleaching experiments (FRAP: fluorescence recovery after photobleaching). The analysis of RNA polymerase I allowed the conclusion that the fibrillar centers are the site of rDNA transcription. The kinetic FRAP analysis of two pol I subunits (RPA194 and RPA53) in transcriptionally active and inactive nucleoli allowed an estimate of the transcription time of rDNA genes in vivo. The individual pol I subunits move rapidly between the nucleoplasm and the nucleolus and associate at rDNA promoter sites. Then they are integrated into productive transcription complexes, which remain stable for the elongation phase of about five minutes at room temperature, and dissociate after termination. At least part of the subunits migrate to the nucleoplasm. The obtained results disagree with models that assume the site of transcription to be in the dense fibrillar component, as well as proposing immobile RNA Polymerase I molecules. The designation of the fibrillar center as site of rDNA transcription was further corroborated by the coexpression of pol I subunits with fibrillarin, a major protein of the dense fibrillar component. Using two differently fluorescing tags, the sites of transcription (fibrillar centers) and the sites of early processing steps, in which fibrillarin participates (dense fibrillar components), could be identified in living cells as closely neighboured but clearly separated compartments. The granular component as the site of late processing steps and assembly of ribosomal proteins was visualized by the expression of B23 and ribosomal proteins L4, L5 and L10. In the course of this work L10 was shown to be localized in the nucleolus for the first time. In the literature, human L10 was assumed to associate with ribosomes only in the cytoplasm. This is not the case, as was shown in particular by experiments with Leptomycin B. This drug inhibits the CRM1 dependent nuclear export pathway and resulted in a clear accumulation of L10 containing preribosomes in the nucleoplasm of human cells. Finally, a novel nucleolar protein (p52) of Xenopus laevis was studied in detail. Antigens of various p52 antibodies, localized in the granular component of nucleoli by immunofluorescence were surprisingly identified as cytokeratin homologs by two-dimensional immunoblot analysis and mass spectrometry. In the course of this work three hitherto unpublished Cytokeratin 19 isoforms of Xenopus were cloned, sequenced and expressed as GFP-fusion proteins. However, these proteins behaved like regular cytokeratins and were integrated into intermediate filaments. They were not detectable in the nucleolus, even after translocation into the nucleus by means of an experimentally added localization signal. Following cotransfection with various nuclear RFP-fusion proteins, GFP-CK19 was transported into the nucleus and localized with ist coexpressed partner. When coexpressed with nucleolar proteins, Cytokeratin 19 was also transported into the nucleolus. Although these experiments indicate a possible piggyback transport mechanism for a normally cytoplasmic protein, Cytokeratin 19 was not specifically located in the granular component of the nucleolus. Therefore, despite all efforts, until now the identity of the nucleolar protein originally identified by immunofluorescence remains to be clarified.