The structure of 11S cruciferin has been solved; however, how the individual subunits contribute to its physico-chemical and functional properties are not well known. The cruciferin isoforms in Arabidopsis thaliana, CRUA, CRUB, and CRUC, were investigated with respect to their molecular structures and the relationship of structural features to the physico-chemical and functional properties of cruciferin using homology modeling and various analytical techniques. Comparison of these models revealed that hydrophobicity and electrostatic potential distribution on the surface of the CRUC homotrimer had more favorable interfacial, solubility, and thermal properties than those of CRUA or CRUB. Flavor binding and pepsin digestion were associated with hypervariable regions (HVRs) and center core regions, respectively, moreso for CRUA and CRUB homotrimers than for CRUC. Chemical imaging of a single cell area in wild type (WT) and double-knockout seeds (CRUAbc, CRUaBc, and CRUabC) using synchrotron FT-IR microscopy (amide I band, 1650 cm-1, νC=O) showed that seed storage proteins were concentrated in the cell center and protein storage vacuoles, whereas lipids were closer to the cell wall. Secondary structure components of proteins of double-knockout lines did not show major differences. Changes in protein secondary structure components of pepsin-treated CRUabC (CRUC) mutant were minimal, indicating low enzyme accessibility. A three-step chromatographic procedure allowed isolation of the hexameric form of cruciferin with high purity (>95%). Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) and circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopic analysis of the secondary structure of these proteins revealed cruciferins were folded into higher order secondary structures; 44−50% β-sheets and 7−9% α-helices. The relative subunit ratio was approximately 1:3:6 (CRUA:CRUB:CRUC) in the WT cruciferin. The Tm values of purified cruciferin at pH 7.4 (μ = 0.0) were in the order of WT = CRUA = CRUB < CRUC. The order of surface hydrophobicity as determined by ANS (1-anilinonaphthalene-8-sulfonate) probe binding was CRUA > CRUB = WT >> CRUC. Intrinsic fluorescence studies revealed a compact molecular structure for the CRUC homohexamer compared to the CRUA and CRUB homohexamers. The order of emulsion forming abilities was CRUA = CRUB > WT > CRUC (no emulsion formation) and the order of heat-induced network structure strength was WT > CRUA = CRUB > CRUC (no gel formation). The inability of CRUC to form gels or emulsions may be attributed to its low surface hydrophobicity and molecular compactness. At pH 2.0, CRUC hexamers dissociated into trimers which allowed the formation of an O/W emulsion and heat-induced network structures. Solubility of cruciferin as a function of pH at low ionic strength gave two minima around pH 4 and 7.4 yielding a “W” shape solubility profile deviating from the typical “U” or “V” shape solubility profile of other 11S globulins. The high ionic strength (μ = 0.5) was not favorable for emulsification, heat-induced gel formation, or solubilization for all cruciferins. Furthermore, the CRUA and CRUB homohexamers exhibited rapid pepsinolysis, while the CRUC homohexamer and WT heterohexamer were digested more slowly. Although fairly well conserved regions were found in the primary structure of these three cruciferin subunits, differences were found in the hypervariable regions and extended loop regions resulting in slight differences in 3D structures and interactions that occur during association to form superstructures, such as hexamers. These differences were reflected in the physico-chemical and techno-functional properties of hexamers and trimers composed of each subunit. In silico predictions for certain functionalities were highly correlated with empirical data from laboratory experiments.

No description available.