Thesis (Ph. D.)--New York University, 1914. / Bibliography: p. 101-104.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Columbia University, 1917. / "Reprinted from Archives of philosophy, no. 12." Vita. Bibliography; p. [63]-65.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--New York University, 1914. / Bibliography: p. 101-104.

The broad scope of my study is the encounter of Christian theology and democratic social theory. Within this area I relate as well as compare to each other the thoughts of the theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer and the political thinker István Bibó. The possibility of the comparison is supported by the fact that both thinkers elaborated a characteristic understanding and concept of freedom on whose basis they investigated a viable political order for post-war Europe. Their understanding of freedom was significantly different and this difference became manifest in the manner of the political reconstruction they proposed. In my analysis of some early writings and wartime considerations of the two thinkers, my main concern is to reveal the relationship of thelogical reasoning and political argumentation, both within the two thinkers' own thoughts and in their encounter. In the first chapter I create an elementary map of the development of the mutual influence of Christianity and democracy. Here I venture to understand democracy from a Christian point of view as tradition, vision, system and process. In the second chapter I show the relationship between Bibó's concept of freedom and his democratic theory. The third and the fourth chapters are devoted to an analysis of Bonhoeffer's theology that was determined by definite political values already at their roots. I conclude that despite several converging elements in their thinking and understanding of the challenge of the times, some fundamental differences remain in the political theories of Bibó and Bonhoeffer, which have their roots in their opposing understanding of freedom.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston University / The problem of this dissertation is the formulation of a method for determining the ethical responsibility of the natural scientist for participation in the development of modern military weapons. This question of responsibility is presented to the scientist by the extreme destructiveness of many modern weapons and by the requests of governments for scientists to participate in the development of new weapons. The role of advanced scientific work has become basic and therefore crucial to the success of weapons development programs. The question of responsibility has been debated among scientists and others, particularly since the development of the atomic bomb. In general, this debate has been inconclusive, and no extended studies of the ethical issues involved or of the method needed for resolution of the issue have appeared. This dissertation is an approach to filling this need. [TRUNCATED]

Inaug.-diss.--Göttingen. / Lebenslauf. Published also as Abhandlungen der Rechts- und staatswissenschaftlichen fakultät der Universität Göttingen. 7.hft. "Literaturverzeichnis": p. [viii]-xii.

No description available.

Thesis (M. Div.)--St. Vladimir's Orthodox Theological Seminary, 1983. / Bibliography: leaves 50-53.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Columbia University, 1920. / Vita. Published also as Teachers College, Columbia University. Contributions to education, no. 112.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Columbia University, 1920. / Vita. Published also as Teachers College, Columbia University. Contributions to education, no. 112.