In the new federal legislation, No Child Left Behind, two of the main themes direct attention to accountability and achievement gaps within subgroup populations. Early intervention may address both of these issues. Specifically, this means quality preschool education. While many agree that preschool education offers much to young children, school leaders have a responsibility to present data to support the effectiveness of preschool programs. This is a report of an evaluation of the effects of a state-funded preschool program on students' language acquisition measured with the Phonological Awareness Literacy Screening-Kindergarten at the end of the program; total English, word analysis, understanding elements of literature, and understanding a variety of resource materials measured with Virginia's Standards of Learning test in grade three; and instructional reading level measured with the STAR Reading Assessment in grade four. The performance of students who attended the Early Start Preschool Program in Suffolk Public Schools was compared with the performance of students who were eligible to attend but did not attend the program. Two-way ANOVAs with analyses of simple main effects following significant interactions were applied to the data from ten samples of preschool children (five samples that attended the Suffolk, Virginia, preschool program and five samples that did not attend) for each year between1998 and 2002. There were few significant findings in this evaluation, and they were scattered across cohorts and dependent measures in no systematic order. Attending Early Start may have an effect on the literacy learning of children; however, this study did not provide the evidence that one would like to see in support of those effects. There are some findings, however, that point to some effects of attendance, particularly on rhyme awareness, concept of word, grade three total English, and grade three understanding elements of literature. These are tentative findings, at best, because they were not found consistently across cohorts. / Ed. D.

An alarming trend of student non-compliance with reading assignments in secondary and post-secondary environments is causing concern in many areas, including college readiness. Public school teachers and university faculty alike are responsible for the literacy levels of graduating students; however, many educators are not implementing the adequate literacy supports within their content area courses. This project used current research on best practice in literacy instruction, as well as the Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning to create the Readers Matter™ evaluative process in which faculty members self-select to be assessed regarding the current levels of student literacy support. After scoring the assessment, evaluators are then able to provide individualized professional development targeting areas of weakness made evident by the Readers Matter™ rubric. The current study evaluated five university instructors at a midsized university in the south-central United States. The results of this preliminary development research identified the data collection procedures that were beneficial and ultimately informative in the evaluation process and enabled developers to make informed decisions regarding individualized professional development.