The diploma thesis concerns itself with the analysis of connection between the media exposure to refugeedom topics and the perceived salience of the issue. Combined qualitative and quantitative research designs ruled by QUAN → qual scheme are used in the thesis. In the quantitative part the effect of exposure to refugeedom-related news on the perceived salience of the subject is constructed using TV and newspaper viewing figures while controlling socio- demographic characteristics of respondents. Binary logistic regression was used to find the influence. The analysis shows that the exposure to content concerning immigration and refugees has influenced the rated importance of the issue. However, there are other variables not included in the model which are affecting the salience. The qualitative approach offers insights into the relationship discovered with quantitative methods. In-depth interviews showed people are aware of the media influence mainly regarding topics they are thinking about and discussing with their social surroundings. According to some interviewees this influence is stronger observed in topics where we lack personal experience, like the refugees. Apart from the media other issues like value orientation, life experience, social surroundings or the extent of criticism may have...

AABBSSTTRRAACCTT TThhiiss tthheessiiss rreefflleeccttss mmooddeerrnn ffaammiillyy ddrraammaa.. IItt bbrriieeffllyy oouuttlliinneess tthhee ssiittuuaattiioonn ooff ddrraammaa aanndd tthheeaatteerr aafftteerr 11998899,, ddeessccrriibbeess tthhee ddeevveellooppmmeenntt ooff CCzzeecchh ffaammiillyy ddrraammaa aanndd bbrriinnggss aawwaarreenneessss ooff tthhee ggeenneerraall EEuurrooppeeaann ccoonntteexxtt.. TThhee mmaaiinn oobbjjeeccttiivvee ooff tthhee tthheessiiss iiss ttoo pprreesseenntt ccoonntteemmppoorraarryy ddrraammaattiicc tteexxttss,, wwhhiicchh ccoonncceerrnnss ffaammiillyy iissssuueess.. BByy uussiinngg tthheeiirr aannaallyyssiiss tthhiiss tthheessiiss ccoommeess ttoo ggeenneerraall ccoonncclluussiioonnss aanndd ccaatteeggoorriieess,, aanndd ttrriieess ttoo ccaappttuurree tthhee ssppeecciiffiicc ffeeaattuurreess ooff tthhiiss kkiinndd ooff ddrraammaa.. TThhiiss wwoorrkk aallssoo lliissttss ssttaaggiinngg ppeerrffoorrmmaanncceess ooff tthheessee tthheeaattrree ppllaayyss,, wwhhiicchh ssiittuuaatteess tteexxttss iinnttoo aa bbrrooaaddeerr ccoonntteexxtt aanndd aaiimmss ttoo ppooiinntt oouutt,, wwhhaatt ccoonntteemmppoorraarryy CCzzeecchh ffaammiillyy ddrraammaa ooccccuuppiieess iinn tthhee tthheeaattrree..

This master thesis deals with the affair Spiegel from 1962 and the Czech Television-Crisis from the turn 2000 and 2001. Both cases are compared by the conceptual approach of democratic consolidation from the Juan Linz's and Alfred Stepan's work The Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation (Baltimore, 1996). The analysis aims to find out whether German Federal Republic in 1962 and the Czech Republic on the start of the third millennium fulfilled the first three Linz's and Stepan's criteria of a consolidated democracy. The theoretical chapter highlights some of alternative approaches and discussions about democratic consolidation as an analytical tool in comparative politics.