Spelling suggestions: "subject:"tidelands"" "subject:"weideland""
1 |
Awareness of sustainable development: why did the Saemangeum Tideland Reclamation Project lead to the first national controversy over sustainable development in South Korea?Choi, In Huck 02 June 2009 (has links)
In this thesis, a list of aspects or characteristics of sustainable development awareness
in a society was made from a literature review of the history of sustainable development,
theories and practices on sustainable development, and sustainable development in
anthropology. An historical review of tideland reclamation in Korea and key informant
interviews about the Saemangeum Tideland Reclamation Project were conducted. It was
an effort to show that the Saemangeum Project became the first national controversy over
sustainable development in South Korea by applying the list of aspects or characteristics
of sustainable development awareness. This study was carried out in an attempt to seek a
way of studying sustainable development from an anthropological point of view. The
results of this study indicated that the majority of aspects or characteristics of sustainable
development awareness had emerged in the early and middle 1990s when the
Saemangeum Project became a national controversy over the environment versus
development. Broadening the research area of sustainable development by focusing on a
human behavior, awareness, is the main contribution of this study to the anthropological
study of development. The thesis concludes with the possibility of a comparative study
between countries where mud-flats are a significant natural resource to deepen
understanding sustainable development.
|
2 |
Aging of Development: the Saemangeum Tideland Reclamation Project (STRP) in South Korea and Sustainable Development of the Two Townships in and out of the STRPChoi, In Huck 2012 May 1900 (has links)
Is the biggest tideland reclamation project in the world (the STRP) sustainable? Since 1991, the STRP which aims at converting mudflats into 401 km2 farmland and industrial complex has been carried out in the southwestern coast of South Korea. I designed a comparative study between two neighboring rural townships with nearly identical social and ecological features except that one is within the project area and no longer has mudflats, and the other is outside of the project area and has retained its mudflats (an important source of clams). This dissertation answers the question above by comparing, sustainable development indicators and quality of life indicators in the two townships. I expected to find that people living in the township within the project area would be more sustainable because they have gone through with the environment versus development controversy in their own villages and many of them participated in person in protests with the national/local environmental movement organizations.
This study uses one of the best known consumption-based sustainable development indicators (SDIs) - Personal Ecological Footprint (PEF), combined with the ethnographic data from the two townships (Gyehwa-township and Simwon-township) – to demonstrate that the PEF values of the two townships appear to be the same and the status of quality of life is quite similar.
As an explanation of the unexpected result, this study contends that the level of sustainable development of the people in the in-project area (Gyehwa-township) has been more affected by nation-wide economic development trajectory than by a major regional development project (the STRP). The first stage of the STRP - the construction of the dykes - has brought about a significant effect of displacement, which cannot be said to be sustainable. However, the total influence on sustainable development in South Korea by the STRP will be determined by the progress of the second stage - internal development.
|
Page generated in 0.0586 seconds