Environ 30% des CDS prédits d'un génome code pour des protéines de fonction inconnue ou hypothétiques. La compréhension du rôle de ces protéines est donc l'un des grands challenges de la communauté scientifique.L'objectif principal de cette thèse est de comprendre la fonction de six protéines de fonction inconnue spécifiques de l'anaérobiose formant un complexe, appelé complexe ORP chez Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough (DvH). Ce système est répandu dans de nombreuses espèces anaérobies, et certaines de ses protéines possèdent des homologies significatives avec des protéines impliquées dans la division cellulaire.Des outils de microscopie dédiés à l'anaérobiose ont été développés au cours de cette thèse et ont permis, pour la première fois, l'observation du cycle cellulaire de DvH. L'étude de l'effet de l'oxygène à l'échelle de la cellule unique a montré une inhibition réversible de la division cellulaire en présence d'oxygène révélant une nouvelle stratégie impliquée dans l'aérotolérance de DvH.Chez DvH, le complexe ORP est codé par des gènes organisés en deux opérons divergents, orp1 et orp2, dont la transcription est gouvernée par l'ARN polymérase sigma54, le facteur de transcription IHF et l'activateur de transcription DVU2106.La diminution de la quantité de complexe ORP conduit à une hétérogénéité de la taille des cellules en accord avec un rôle potentiel du complexe dans le contrôle de la division cellulaire. Alors que l'absence de certaines protéines ORP n'affecte pas de manière significative la division de la bactérie en anaérobiose, la protéine DVU2109 présente une localisation dynamique au cours du cycle cellulaire et semble être essentielle chez DvH. / Up to now, approximately 30% of the predicted CDS in genomes encode for hypothetical or unknown function proteins. Understanding the role and the function of these proteins is now a major challenge for the scientific community.The main objective of this thesis is to determine the function of six proteins of unknown function specific of anaerobiosis and able to forming a multiprotein complex in Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough (DvH), named the ORP complex. This system is widely found in many anaerobic microorganisms, and some proteins of this system have significant homologies with proteins involved in cell division.Tools for microscopy in anaerobiosis have been developed during this thesis and have allowed observation, for the first time, of a complete DvH cell cycle. The study of oxygen effect on DvH at a single cell level has showed a reversible inhibition of cell division during oxygen exposure revealing a new strategy involved in DvH aerotolerance.In DvH, the ORP complex is encoding by genes organized in two divergent operons, orp1 and orp2, whose transcription is governed by sigma 54 RNA polymerase, the transcription factor IHF and the transcriptional regulator DVU2106. The decreased in the amount of ORP complex leads to heterogeneity of the cell size in accordance with a potential role of this complex in the spatio-temporal control of DvH cell division. While the absence of the majority of ORP proteins doesn't significantly affect DvH division in anaerobic conditions, the protein DVU2109 has a dynamic location during cell cycle and appears to be essential in the cell.

La méthylation de l'ADN est une marque épigénétique répressive impliquée dans de nombreux processus physiologiques et pathologiques. Des hyperméthylations de promoteurs sont ainsi responsables de répressions transcriptionnelles de gènes suppresseurs de tumeurs dans les cancers. La méthylation de l'ADN serait capable d'induire une répression transcriptionnelle par la combinaison de deux mécanismes principaux : l'éloignement de facteurs de transcription activateurs, et le recrutement de protéines répressives liant spécifiquement l'ADN méthylé. MBD2 est une protéine de liaison à l'ADN méthylé capable de recruter les complexes répresseurs NuRD et SIN3A. ZBTB4 est capable de se lier à l'ADN méthylé in vitro et induit une répression de la transcription de plasmides méthylés lorsqu'elle est surexprimée. Son rôle de répresseur transcriptionnel dépendant de la méthylation de l'ADN reste toutefois peu documenté. Nous avons identifiés par RNAseq les modifications du transcriptome induites par une déplétion de MBD2 ou de ZBTB4. Les gènes surexprimés après déplétion de MBD2 ou ZBTB4 sont méthylés sur leur promoteur, et sont aussi surexprimés après traitement avec des agents déméthylants. Des résultats d'immuno-précipitations de chromatine réalisées contre les deux protéines endogènes montrent que la quasi-totalité des sites de fixation de MBD2 et qu'une partie des sites de fixations de ZBTB4 correspondent à des régions méthylés. Ces résultats confirment à l'échelle du génome que MBD2 endogène est bien un interprète majeur de la méthylation de l'ADN, et que ZBTB4 réprime bien la transcription de gènes méthylés. Nous avons aussi observé une redistribution importante de MBD2 sur le génome dans des modèles de progression tumorale. Nos résultats montrent que les gènes réprimés pendant la transformation oncogénique le sont en partie par MBD2. L'expression de certains de ces gènes peut être induite dans les lignées transformées par déplétion de MBD2 par siRNA / DNA methylation is an epigenetic mark that plays a role in many physiological and pathological processes. Indeed, silencing of tumor suppressor genes in cancer is frequently caused by promoter hypermethylations. Transcriptional repression induced by DNA methylation is likely caused by the combination of two mechanisms: the repulsion of activator transcription factors, and the recruitment of repressor proteins able to specifically recognize methylated DNA. MBD2 is a methyl DNA binding protein that cans recruits NuRD or SIN3A repressor complexes. ZBTB4 is able to bind methylated DNA in vitro, and can repress the transcription of methylated plasmids when overexpressed. Its methylationdependent transcriptional repressor function remains poorly documented. By RNAseq, we have identified transcriptomic modifications induced by the depletion of either MBD2 or ZBTB4. Genes up regulated after MBD2 or ZBTB4 depletion were methylated on their promoter, and were also up regulated after treatment with demethylating agents. Chromatin immunoprecipitations experiments against endogenous proteins showed that almost all MBD2 binding sites, and that a part of ZBTB4 binding sites, correspond to methylated DNA regions. These results confirmed at genome wide scale that endogenous MBD2 is a major reader of DNA methylation and that ZBTB4 does repress the transcription of methylated genes. We observed an important redistribution of MBD2 on the genome in models of tumor progression. Our results showed that MBD2 plays role in gene repressions occurring during oncogenic transformation. Some of those repressed genes can be re-expressed in transformed cell lines after depletion of MBD2 by siRNA

De nombreuses bacteries pathogènes sont capables d'affecter les programmes transcriptionnels de la cellule hôte pendant l'infection. Cependant, les mécanismes contrôlant ce processus restent largement méconnus. En investigant les effets de la Listerai monocytogenes sur les modifications des histones de l'hôte, nous avons mis en évidence un nouveau mecanisme de régulation de transcription nécessaire pour la répression de certains gènes, pendant l'infection. Lors de l'infection par L. monocytogenes, le facteur de virulence sécrété, InlB, se lie au récepteur c-Met et active la signalisation par les intermédiaires PI3K et Akt. cette plateforme de signalisation est nécessaire pour la relocalisation de la deacetylase d'histone, SIRT2, au noyau et l'association à la chromatine.En caractérisant me mécanisme gouvernant la relocalisation nucléaire de SIRT2 lors de l'infection, nous avons démontrés que SIRT2 subit une modification post-traductionnelle. SIRT2 est déphosphorylée à un nouveau site de phosphorylation localisé à la partie terminale de la protéine. SIRT2 est recrutée au site de démarrage de la transcription des gènes réprimés lors de l'infection menant à la deacetylation de H3K18 et la répression transcriptionnelle. Nous avons mis en évidence que SIRT2 est détournée par L. monocytogenes et provoque une croissance des bactéries intracellulaires. Ces résultats démontrent un clef de SIRT2 en provoquant la deacetylation de H3K18 mors de l'infection et dévoilent un nouveau mécanisme imposée par les bactéries pathogènes dans le but de reprogrammer la cellule hôte. / Bacterial pathogens dramatically affect host cell transcription programs for their own profit, however the underlying mechanism in most cases remain elusive. While investigating the effects of listeria monocytogenes on histone modifications, we discovered a new transcription regulatory machanism by which the expression of genes is repressed, during infection. Upon infection by L. monocytogenes, the secret virulence factor, InlB, binds the c-Met receptor and activates signaling through PI3K/Akt. This signaling platform is necessary for causing the relocalization of the histone deacetylase, SIRT2, to the nucleus and associating to chromatin.In characterizing the mechanism governing SIRT2 nuclear relocazing during infection, our results have demonstrated that SIRT2 undergoes a post-translational modification. SIRT2 undergoes dephosphorylation at a novel N-terminal phospho-site. SIRT2 is recruiter to the transcription star sites of genes repressed during inection leading to H3K18 deacetylation and transcriptional repression.finnaly, my results demonstrate that SIRT2 is hijacked by L monocytogenes and promotes an increase in intracellular bacteria. Together, these data uncover a key role for SIRT2 mediated H3K18 deacetylation during infection and characterize a novel mechanisme imposed by a pathogenic bacteriomto reprogram the host cell.

A bacterial and archaeal adaptive immune system, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats and CRISPR-associated proteins (CRISPR-Cas), has recently been engineered for genome editing. This RNA-guided platform has simplified genetic manipulation and holds promise for therapeutic applications. However, off-target editing has been one of the major concerns of the commonly used Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 (SpyCas9). Despite extensive enzyme engineering to reduce off-target editing of SpyCas9, we have turned to nature and uncovered a Cas9 ortholog from Neisseria meningitidis (Nme) with high fidelity. In the first part of my thesis, we have systematically characterized Nme1Cas9 for engineering mammalian genomes and demonstrated its high specificity by genome-wide off-targeting detection methods in vitro and in cellulo, and thus provided a new platform for accurate genome editing. Due to its flexibility, CRISPR is becoming a versatile tool not only for genome editing, but also for chromatin manipulation. These alternative applications are possible because of the programmable targeting capacity of catalytically dead Cas9 (dCas9). In the second part of my thesis, we have combined dCas9 with the engineered plant enzyme ascorbate peroxidase (APEX2) to develop a proteomic method called dCas9-APEX2 biotinylation at genomic elements by restricted spatial tagging (C-BERST). Relying on the spatially restricted, fast biotin labeling of proteins near defined genomic loci, C-BERST enables the high-throughput identification of known telomere- and centromere- associated proteomes and novel factors. Furthermore, we have extended C-BERST to map the c-fos promoter and gained new insights regarding the dynamic transcriptional regulation process. Taken together, C-BERST can advance our understanding of chromatin regulators and their roles in nuclear and chromosome biology.

The rationale behind targeted molecular therapy in cancer, oncogene addiction, is that tumors rely on driver oncogenes to control their proliferation and survival. Therefore, an efficacious targeted therapy should induce a dual, detrimental response to the tumor. While there have been clinical success stories using targeted therapies, even tumors that are initially sensitive invariably develop resistance. In the case of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), despite extensive evidence pointing to its driver oncogene status, inhibitors of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) are considered clinically inefficacious. Resistance to EGFR inhibition has been predominantly described as due to genetic alterations. Yet it remains unclear why patients exhibiting the same dysregulated status of a driver oncogene react to targeted therapy, as in the case of EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer, while others do not at all (i.e., TNBC). Furthermore, not all of resistance can be described by genetic alterations to EGFR, to its pathway effectors, or to compensatory pathways. Emerging data reveals that drugs can induce resistance by rewiring epigenomic, transcriptional, and translational regulatory mechanisms. Unfortunately, a major limitation in designing efficacious treatments is our inability to predict whether cell types can rewire in response to drug exposure. Therefore, it is necessary to elucidate mechanisms of growth and survival in cells that have undergone rewiring. This study characterized intrinsic resistance to EGFR inhibition in TNBC. We found that EGFR inhibition induces rewiring, which results in a resistant growth state that bypasses the EGFR-MAPK pathway as a whole. Additionally, we found that a tRNA-modifying complex masks the oncogene addiction status of EGFR in TNBC by stabilizing the protein abundance of a pro-survival protein. Importantly, this happens solely in the context of EGFR inhibition. Taken together, this study highlights potential therapeutic strategies for TNBC and strategies that can be used to improve our understanding of targeted therapy resistance, especially intrinsic resistance.

Transcriptional deregulation has emerged as one of the leading causes in various human diseases. More than fifty percent of cancers arise due to frequent mutations in genes regulating transcription. Higher-order assembly via protein-protein interactions is one common mechanism of transcriptional regulation. Despite their critical role in regulating gene transcription and therapeutic relevance, detailed mechanistic understanding of these assemblies remains scarce. The primary focus of this thesis is to uncover important structural principles underlying the assembly and stability of multi-domain protein assemblies by characterizing components of the IFNβ enhanceosome and the CtBP-mediated repression complex. Using a combination of biochemical and structural analyses, I showed that the transcriptional activator C-terminal binding protein 2 (CtBP2) is a tetramer by solving the 3.6Å cryoEM structure of CtBP2. I highlighted the types of interactions that stabilize the homo-tetramer and showed the relevance of the tetramer in CtBP2 transcriptional activity. Second, I used an integrative approach to investigate the structural features leading to activation of interferon regulator factor 3 (IRF3) and its interaction with DNA. Although this work mostly focused on components of the CtBP2-mediated complex and IFNβ enhanceosome, the principles described here can be applied to other complexes. Therefore, these studies provide an overall understanding on how other macromolecular complexes regulate gene transcription. Furthermore, our structural-based analyses will provide a basis for designing drugs that can regulate gene transcription in cancer and immunological disorders.

Gene expression of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1), which causes Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS), is regulated at the transcriptional level, where negative factors can block elongation that is overcome by HIV Tat protein and P-TEFb. P-TEFb, a positive elongation transcription factor with two subunits, CDK9 and Cyclin T1 (CycT1), catalyzes Tat-dependent phosphorylation of Ser-5 in the Pol II C-terminal domain (CTD), allowing production of longer mRNAs. Ser-5 phosphorylation enables the CTD to recruit mammalian mRNA capping enzyme (Mce1) and stimulate its guanylyltransferase activity. This dissertation demonstrates that stable binding of Mce1 and cap methyltransferase to template-engaged Pol II depends on CTD phosphorylation, but not on nascent RNA. Capping and methylation doesn't occur until nascent pre-mRNA become 19-22 nucleotides long. A second and novel pathway for recruiting and activating Mce1 involved direct physical interaction between the CTD, Tat and Mce1. Tat stimulated the guanylyltransferase and triphosphatase activities of Mce1, thereby enhancing the otherwise low efficiency of cotranscriptional capping of HIV mRNA. These findings imply that multiple mechanisms exist for coupling transcription elongation and mRNA processing at a checkpoint critical to HIV gene expression. To elucidate P-TEFb's function in human (HeLa) cells, RNA interference (RNAi) was used to degrade mRNA for hCycT1 or CDK9. Down-regulation of P-TEFb expression by RNAi can be achieved without causing major toxic or lethal effects and can control Tat transactivation and HIV replication in host cells. High-density oligonucleotide arrays were used to determine the effect of P-TEFb knockdown on global gene expression. Of 44,928 human genes analyzed, 25 were down-regulated and known or likely to be involved in cell proliferation and differentiation. These results provide new insight into P-TEFb function, its potent role in early embryonic development and strong evidence that P-TEFb is a new target for developing AIDS and cancer therapies. To fulfill the promise of RNAi for treating infectious and human genetic diseases, structural and functional mechanisms underlying RNAi in human cells were studied. The status of the 5' hydroxyl terminus of the antisense strand of short interfering RNA (siRNA) duplexes determined RNAi activity, while a 3' terminus block was tolerated in vivo. A perfect A-form helix in siRNA was not required for RNAi, but was required for antisense-target RNA duplexes. Strikingly, crosslinking siRNA duplexes with psoralen did not completely block RNAi, indicating that complete unwinding of the siRNA helix is not necessary for RNAi in vivo. These results suggest that RNA amplification by RNA-dependent RNA polymerase is not essential for RNAi in human cells.

RNA interference (RNAi) is one of the key mechanisms that are involved in many biological processes such as control of plant gene expression, influence on chromatin arrangement or providing protection against invasive DNA or RNA transposons, viruses and transgenes. In plants, RNAi is triggered by double stranded RNA (dsRNA) that is cleaved by DICER LIKE (DCL) proteins to small RNAs (sRNAs). The size of these sRNAs is in range of 21 - 24 nucleotides (nt). Small RNA acts in the place of origin and they are also a mobile signal which in plants can move to a short distance through plasmodesmata and to a long distance trough phloem. sRNA and Argonaute (AGO) protein form RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). Together, they recognize the target RNA molecule and contribute to an efficient RNAi phase which may be exhibited by gene silencing at posttranscriptional level (PTGS) or transcriptional level (TGS). The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of silencing constructs, witch in a controlled way differently trigger RNAi directed against the expression of the GFP reporter gene in the model organism Arabidopsis thaliana. Silencing constructs were placed under an inducible promoter activated by the presence of 17-β-estradiol (XVE system). They differed in the way of the dsRNA formation and in the...

Cellular function and physiology are largely established through regulated gene expression. The first step in gene expression, transcription of the genomic DNA into RNA, is a process that is highly aligned at the levels of initiation, elongation and termination. In eukaryotes, protein-coding genes are exclusively transcribed by RNA polymerase II (Pol II). Upon transcription of the first 15-20 nucleotides (nt), the emerging nascent RNA 5’ end is modified with a 7-methylguanosyl cap. This is one of several RNA modifications and processing steps that take place during transcription, i.e. co-transcriptionally. For example, protein-coding sequences (exons) are often disrupted by non-coding sequences (introns) that are removed by RNA splicing. The two transesterification reactions required for RNA splicing are catalyzed through the action of a large macromolecular machine, the spliceosome. Several non-coding small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) and proteins form functional spliceosomal subcomplexes, termed snRNPs. Sequentially with intron synthesis different snRNPs recognize sequence elements within introns, first the 5’ splice site (5‘ SS) at the intron start, then the branchpoint and at the end the 3’ splice site (3‘ SS). Multiple conformational changes and concerted assembly steps lead to formation of the active spliceosome, cleavage of the exon-intron junction, intron lariat formation and finally exon-exon ligation with cleavage of the 3’ intron-exon junction. Estimates on pre-mRNA splicing duration range from 15 sec to several minutes or, in terms of distance relative to the 3‘ SS, the earliest detected splicing events were 500 nt downstream of the 3‘ SS. However, the use of indirect assays, model genes and transcription induction/blocking leave the question of when pre-mRNA splicing of endogenous transcripts occurs unanswered. In recent years, global studies concluded that the majority of introns are removed during the course of transcription. In principal, co-transcriptional splicing reduces the need for post-transcriptional processing of the pre-mRNA. This could allow for quicker transcriptional responses to stimuli and optimal coordination between the different steps. In order to gain insight into how pre-mRNA splicing might be functionally linked to transcription, I wanted to determine when co-transcriptional splicing occurs, how transcripts with multiple introns are spliced and if and how the transcription termination process is influenced by pre-mRNA splicing. I chose two yeast species, S. cerevisiae and S. pombe, to study co-transcriptional splicing. Small genomes, short genes and introns, but very different number of intron-containing genes and multi-intron genes in S. pombe, made the combination of both model organisms a promising system to study by next-generation sequencing and to learn about co-transcriptional splicing in a broad context with applicability to other species. I used nascent RNA-Seq to characterize co-transcriptional splicing in S. pombe and developed two strategies to obtain single-molecule information on co-transcriptional splicing of endogenous genes: (1) with paired-end short read sequencing, I obtained the 3’ nascent transcript ends, which reflect the position of Pol II molecules during transcription, and the splicing status of the nascent RNAs. This is detected by sequencing the exon-intron or exon-exon junctions of the transcripts. Thus, this strategy links Pol II position with intron splicing of nascent RNA. The increase in the fraction of spliced transcripts with further distance from the intron end provides valuable information on when co-transcriptional splicing occurs. (2) with Pacific Biosciences sequencing (PacBio) of full-length nascent RNA, it is possible to determine the splicing pattern of transcripts with multiple introns, e.g. sequentially with transcription or also non-sequentially. Part of transcription termination is cleavage of the nascent transcript at the polyA site. The splicing status of cleaved and non-cleaved transcripts can provide insights into links between splicing and transcription termination and can be obtained from PacBio data. I found that co-transcriptional splicing in S. pombe is similarly prevalent to other species and that most introns are removed co-transcriptionally. Co-transcriptional splicing levels are dependent on intron position, adjacent exon length, and GC-content, but not splice site sequence. A high level of co-transcriptional splicing is correlated with high gene expression. In addition, I identified low abundance circular RNAs in intron-containing, as well as intronless genes, which could be side-products of RNA transcription and splicing. The analysis of co-transcriptional splicing patterns of 88 endogenous S. cerevisiae genes showed that the majority of intron splicing occurs within 100 nt downstream of the 3‘ SS. Saturation levels vary, and confirm results of a previous study. The onset of splicing is very close to the transcribing polymerase (within 27 nt) and implies that spliceosome assembly and conformational rearrangements must be completed immediately upon synthesis of the 3‘ SS. For S. pombe genes with multiple introns, most detected transcripts were completely spliced or completely unspliced. A smaller fraction showed partial splicing with the first intron being most often not spliced. Close to the polyA site, most transcripts were spliced, however uncleaved transcripts were often completely unspliced. This suggests a beneficial influence of pre-mRNA splicing for efficient transcript termination. Overall, sequencing of nascent RNA with the two strategies developed in this work offers significant potential for the analysis of co-transcriptional splicing, transcription termination and also RNA polymerase pausing by profiling nascent 3’ ends. I could define the position of pre-mRNA splicing during the process of transcription and provide evidence for fast and efficient co-transcriptional splicing in S. cerevisiae and S. pombe, which is associated with highly expressed genes in both organisms. Differences in S. pombe co-transcriptional splicing could be linked to gene architecture features, like intron position, GC-content and exon length.

It is currently believed that the splicing of most pre-mRNAs occurs, at least in part, co-transcriptionally. In order to validate this principle in yeast and establish an experimental system for monitoring spliceosome assembly in vivo, I have employed the chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay to study co-transcriptional splicing events. Here, I use ChIP to examine key questions with respect to the recent proposal that RNA polymerase II (Pol II) recruits pre-mRNA splicing factors to active genes. In my thesis, I address: 1) whether the U1 snRNP, which binds to the 5¡¦ splice site of each intron, is recruited co-transcriptionally in vivo and 2) if so, where along the length of active genes the U1 snRNP is concentrated. U1 snRNP accumulates on downstream positions of genes containing introns but not within promoter regions or along intronless genes. More specifically, accumulation correlated with the presence and position of the intron, indicating that the intron is necessary for co-transcriptional U1 snRNP recruitment and/or retention (Kotovic et al., 2003). In contrast to capping enzymes, which bind directly to Pol II (Komarnitsky et al., 2000; Schroeder et al., 2000), the U1 snRNP is poorly detected in promoter regions, except in genes harboring promoter-proximal introns. Detection of the U1 snRNP is dependent on RNA synthesis and is abolished by intron removal. Microarray data reveals that intron-containing genes are preferentially selected by ChIP with the U1 snRNP furthermore indicating recruitment specificity to introns. Because U1 snRNP levels decrease on downstream regions of intron-containing genes with long second exons, our lab is expanding the study to 3¡¦ splice site factors in hopes to address co-transcriptional splicing. In my thesis, I also focus on questions pertaining to the requirements for recruitment of the U1 snRNP to sites of transcription. To test the proposal that the cap-binding complex (CBC) promotes U1 snRNP recognition of the 5¡¦ splice site (Colot et al., 1996), I use a ?´CBC mutant strain and determine U1 snRNP accumulation by ChIP. Surprisingly, lack of the CBC has no effect on U1 snRNP recruitment. The U1 snRNP component Prp40p has been identified as playing a pivotal role in not only cross-intron bridging (Abovich and Rosbash, 1997), but also as a link between Pol II transcription and splicing factor recruitment (Morris and Greenleaf, 2000). My data shows that Prp40p recruitment mirrors that of other U1 snRNP proteins, in that it is not detected on promoter regions, suggesting that Prp40p does not constitutively bind the phosphorylated C-terminal domain (CTD) of Pol II as previously proposed. This physical link between Pol II transcription and splicing factor recruitment is further tested in Prp40p mutant strains, in which U1 snRNP is detected at normal levels. Therefore, U1 snRNP recruitment to transcription units is not dependent on Prp40p activity. My data indicates that co-transcriptional U1 snRNP recruitment is not dependent on the CBC or Prp40p and that any effects of these players on spliceosome assembly must be reflected in later spliceosome events. My data contrasts the proposed transcription factory model in which Pol II plays a central role in the recruitment of mRNA processing factors to TUs. According to my data, splicing factor recruitment acts differently than capping enzyme and 3¡¦ end processing factor recruitment; U1 snRNP does not accumulate at promoter regions of intron-containing genes or on intronless genes rather, accumulation is based on the synthesis of the intron. These experiments have lead me to propose a kinetic model with respect to the recruitment of splicing factors to active genes. In this model, U1 snRNP accumulation at the 5¡¦ splice site requires a highly dynamic web of protein-protein and protein-RNA interactions to occur, ultimately leading to the recruitment and/or stabilization of the U1 snRNP.