1 |
Enhancement of precise underwater object localizationKaveripakum, S., Chinthaginjala, R., Anbazhagan, R., Alibakhshikenari, M., Virdee, B., Khan, S., Pau, G., See, C.H., Dayoub, I., Livreri, P., Abd-Alhameed, Raed 24 July 2023 (has links)
Yes / Underwater communication applications extensively use localization services for object identification. Because of their significant impact on ocean exploration and monitoring, underwater wireless sensor networks (UWSN) are becoming increasingly popular, and acoustic communications have largely overtaken radio frequency (RF) broadcasts as the dominant means of communication. The two localization methods that are most frequently employed are those that estimate the angle of arrival (AOA) and the time difference of arrival (TDoA). The military and civilian sectors rely heavily on UWSN for object identification in the underwater environment. As a result, there is a need in UWSN for an accurate localization technique that accounts for dynamic nature of the underwater environment. Time and position data are the two key parameters to accurately define the position of an object. Moreover, due to climate change there is now a need to constrain energy consumption by UWSN to limit carbon emission to meet net-zero target by 2050. To meet these challenges, we have developed an efficient localization algorithm for determining an object position based on the angle and distance of arrival of beacon signals. We have considered the factors like sensor nodes not being in time sync with each other and the fact that the speed of sound varies in water. Our simulation results show that the proposed approach can achieve great localization accuracy while accounting for temporal synchronization inaccuracies. When compared to existing localization approaches, the mean estimation error (MEE) and energy consumption figures, the proposed approach outperforms them. The MEEs is shown to vary between 84.2154m and 93.8275m for four trials, 61.2256m and 92.7956m for eight trials, and 42.6584m and 119.5228m for twelve trials. Comparatively, the distance-based measurements show higher accuracy than the angle-based measurements.
|
2 |
Performance Evaluation of Opportunistic Routing Protocols for Multi-hop Wireless NetworksGuercin, Sergio Rolando 15 March 2019 (has links)
Nowadays, Opportunistic Routing (OR) is widely considered to be the most important
paradigm for Multi-hop wireless networks (MWNs). It exploits the broadcast nature of
wireless medium to propagate information from one point to another within the network.
In OR scheme, when a node has new information to share, it rst needs to set its forwarding
list which include the IDs and/or any relevant information to its best suited neighboring
nodes. This operation is supported by the use of appropriate metrics. Then, it executes
a coordination algorithm allowing transmission reliability and high throughput among the
next-hop forwarders. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive guide to understand the
characteristics and challenges faced in the area of opportunistic routing protocols in MWNs.
Moreover, since the planet we live on is largely covered by water, OR protocols have
gained much attention during the last decade in real-time aquatic applications, such as
oil/chemical spill monitoring, ocean resource management, anti-submarine missions and
so on. One of the major problems in Underwater Wireless Sensor Network (UWSNs) is
determining an e cient and reliable routing methodology between the source node and the
destination node. Therefore, designing e cient and robust routing protocols for UWSNs
became an attractive topic for researchers. This paper seeks to address in detail the key
factors of underwater sensor network. Furthermore, it calls into question 5 state-of-the-art
routing protocols proposed for UWSN: The Depth-Based Routing protocol (DBR), the
Energy-E cient Depth-Based Routing protocol (EEDBR), the Hydraulic-pressure-based
anycast routing protocol (Hydrocast), the Geographic and opportunistic routing protocol
with Depth Adjustment for mobile underwater sensor networks (GEDAR), and the Void-
Aware Pressure Routing for underwater sensor networks (VAPR). Finally, it covers the
performance of those protocol through the use of the R programming language.
|
Page generated in 0.1033 seconds