Thesis (M.A. in Political Science)--University of California, Berkeley, Dec. 1913. / Includes bibliographical references (Appendix E).

Treatise (D.M.A.)--University of Texas at Austin, 2006. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (M.A.)--Butler University, 1986. / Bibliography: leaves 111-116.

Thesis (D.M.A.)--University of Texas at Austin, 2006. / Includes abstract and vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 110-112)

Not available / text

Not available / text

The decade of the 1850s saw the Texas press separate into two opposing groups on the issue of filibustering. The basis for this division was the personal beliefs of the editors regarding the role filibustering should have in society. Although a lust for wealth drove most filibusters, the press justified territorial expansion along altruistic lines. By 1858, however, a few newspapers discarded this argument and condemned filibusters as lawless bands of ruffians plundering peaceful neighbors. Throughout the decade, the papers gradually drifted from a consensus in 1850 to discord by the date of William Walker's third attempt on Nicaragua in 1858.