Spelling suggestions: "subject:"weight:height"" "subject:"weight:weight""
31 |
Facilitating Weight Tolerance Among Health and Fitness Majors Toward Obese PersonsBoss, Stephanie 01 January 2015 (has links)
Weight bias exists in some health-related degree programs. Overweight and obese persons who experience weight bias in health-related services often delay or avoid medical attention altogether. Guided by the attribution theory, the purpose of this sequential explanatory study was to examine weight bias among health majors at a southwest regional university to illuminate how attitudes can affect the level of care provided to overweight persons. The Attitudes toward Obese Persons (ATOP) scores from a convenience sample of 184 health majors revealed that participants' scores were found to be significantly lower than the midpoint (60) of the ATOP scale, M = 56.68, SD = 16.75, t(183) = -2.69, p < .01, indicating more negative attitudes toward obese persons. As a follow-up measure, 12 interviews were conducted to examine how health majors described their own experiences in working with obese persons. Thematic analysis revealed that the majority of participants expressed common stereotypes to describe obese persons as lazy, lacking self-discipline, and unhealthy. The integration of both sets of data supported the need to develop weight bias curriculum to facilitate social change whereby adaptive approaches to minimize weight bias among students within the classroom and clinical settings become best practice. Future research efforts in the development and evaluation of interventions are needed to reduce weight bias among academic institutions that offer health-related degree programs.
|
32 |
Relationships harm, relationships heal: Exploring larger bodied people's experiences of weight stigma and eating disorders in the context of family relationshipsBelinsky, Rebecca Erin 27 June 2023 (has links)
No description available.
|
33 |
Weight Stigma and Disease and Disability Concepts of Obesity: A Survey of the German PopulationHilbert, Anja, Zenger, Markus, Luck-Sikorski, Claudia, Brähler, Elmar 28 March 2024 (has links)
Introduction: Recent years have witnessed a medicalization
of obesity, promoting a classification as a disease or disability
in order to reduce or protect against weight stigma and
discrimination. This study sought to investigate the public
understanding of the disability and disease concepts in obesity,
their acceptance, and association with weight stigma.
Methods: In a representative German population sample
(n = 2,524), public views of obesity as a disease or disability
were assessed via a self-report questionnaire. For the assessment
of weight stigma, the Weight Control/Blame subscale
from the Antifat Attitudes Test was used. Results: A significantly
greater acceptance of the disease than the disability
concept was found (37.1 vs. 15.4%). Both disease and disability
were mainly viewed as physical conditions, although onethird
also viewed obesity as a mental disease. While agreement
with the disease concept – especially of physical and
genetic disease – significantly predicted lower weight stigma;
agreement with the disability concept – especially of
mental or intellectual disability – predicted higher weight
stigma. Conclusions: These results suggest a careful use of
the disease and disability terms and precise definitions. The
disability concept in particular carries notions that are publicly
devalued.
|
34 |
A novel measure to assess self-discrimination in binge eating disorder and obesityRudolph, Almut, Hilbert, Anja 24 June 2016 (has links) (PDF)
Stigmatized obese individuals tend to internalize the pervasive weight stigma which might lead to self-discrimination and increased psychopathology. While explicit and implicit weight stigma can be measured using self-report questionnaires and Implicit Association Tests (IAT), respectively, the assessment of self-discrimination relied solely on self-report. The present study sought to develop an IAT measuring implicit self-discrimination (SD-IAT) in samples of obese individuals with and without binge-eating disorder (BED). Seventy-eight individuals were recruited from the community and individually matched in three groups. Obese participants with BED, obese participants without BED (OB), and a normal weight control group without eating disorder psychopathology (HC) were assessed with the SD-IAT and other measures relevant for convergent and discriminant validation. Results revealed significantly higher implicit self-discrimination in the BED group when compared to both OB and HC. Furthermore, significant correlations were found between the SD-IAT with body mass index, experiences of weight stigma, depressive symptoms, and implicit self-esteem. Finally, implicit self-discrimination predicted eating disorder psychopathology over and above group membership, and experiences of weight stigma. This study provides first evidence of the validity of the SD-IAT. Assessing implicit self-discrimination might further increase understanding of weight stigma and its significance for psychosocial functioning among vulnerable obese individuals.
|
35 |
Weight-Related Health Disparities and Lifestyle Behaviors Among Sexual and Gender Minority StudentsWhipps, Jonathon 10 September 2021 (has links)
No description available.
|
36 |
A novel measure to assess self-discrimination in binge eating disorder and obesityRudolph, Almut, Hilbert, Anja January 2014 (has links)
Stigmatized obese individuals tend to internalize the pervasive weight stigma which might lead to self-discrimination and increased psychopathology. While explicit and implicit weight stigma can be measured using self-report questionnaires and Implicit Association Tests (IAT), respectively, the assessment of self-discrimination relied solely on self-report. The present study sought to develop an IAT measuring implicit self-discrimination (SD-IAT) in samples of obese individuals with and without binge-eating disorder (BED). Seventy-eight individuals were recruited from the community and individually matched in three groups. Obese participants with BED, obese participants without BED (OB), and a normal weight control group without eating disorder psychopathology (HC) were assessed with the SD-IAT and other measures relevant for convergent and discriminant validation. Results revealed significantly higher implicit self-discrimination in the BED group when compared to both OB and HC. Furthermore, significant correlations were found between the SD-IAT with body mass index, experiences of weight stigma, depressive symptoms, and implicit self-esteem. Finally, implicit self-discrimination predicted eating disorder psychopathology over and above group membership, and experiences of weight stigma. This study provides first evidence of the validity of the SD-IAT. Assessing implicit self-discrimination might further increase understanding of weight stigma and its significance for psychosocial functioning among vulnerable obese individuals.
|
37 |
Effects of Acetaminophen on Pain Response among Overweight or Obese Women Exposed to Weight StigmatizationLanders, Jacob David January 2021 (has links)
No description available.
|
Page generated in 0.0438 seconds