This dissertation is an examination of the ontological status of global character traits. Do global character traits exist? If so, what are they and how do they work? Globalism represents the most intuitive and widespread conception of global character traits. According to this conception, possession of robust character traits explains systematic behavioral manifestations. However, as the work of Gilbert Harman and Jon Doris demonstrates, Globalism has problems. The social psychological behavioral empirical literature fails to vindicate the behavioral expectations that come with Globalism. Essentially, we aren't cross-situationally consistent, our behavior in one trait-relevant situation is not strongly correlated with our behavior in a different trait-relevant situation. This literature has led to the emergence of Situationism, the social psychological theory that powerful situational features are primarily causally efficacious in the performance of behavior. It certainly appears as though Situationism is true, and our behavior is conditioned by surprising features of the situation, subtle features that are significantly more powerful than we intuitively believe. Accordingly, I present my own view, Practice-Driven Globalism as a solution to the problem presented by Situationism. Global character traits are illusory, yet they are very useful posits. These traits have epistemic, functional, normative, and educational utility. They play a vital role in the core human practices of casting a conception of the self and others, constructing a narrative, making moral judgments, and providing moral education. Practice-Driven Globalism is a hybrid view; Someone (S) should use Globalism as the default position to explain and evaluate behavior (B) unless S knows, or has good reasons to believe, that situational features are primarily causally efficacious in the performance of B. Just as a NASA scientist utilizes Newtonian mechanics to launch a satellite and then Relativistic mechanics in order to use that satellite for GPS purposes, we should use Globalism in some instances and Situationism in others. Practice-Driven Globalism enhances our empirically informed moral psychology by meeting the challenge of Situationism while providing grounds for the maintenance of our old framework for certain purposes. / A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Philosophy in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. / Fall Semester, 2011. / October 31, 2011. / Gilbert Harman, Globalism, John Doris, Moral psychology, Situationism, Utility / Includes bibliographical references. / Michael Bishop, Professor Directing Dissertation; Thomas Joiner, University Representative; Michael Ruse, Committee Member; Marie Fleming, Committee Member.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:fsu.edu/oai:fsu.digital.flvc.org:fsu_183014 |
| Contributors | Miller, Michael B. (Michael Benjamin), 1982- (authoraut), Bishop, Michael (professor directing dissertation), Joiner, Thomas (university representative), Ruse, Michael (committee member), Fleming, Marie (committee member), Department of Philosophy (degree granting department), Florida State University (degree granting institution) |
| Publisher | Florida State University, Florida State University |
| Source Sets | Florida State University |
| Language | English, English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Text, text |
| Format | 1 online resource, computer, application/pdf |
| Rights | This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s). The copyright in theses and dissertations completed at Florida State University is held by the students who author them. |
Page generated in 0.0079 seconds