Return to search

Interpreting Accident Statistics

Accident statistics have often been used to support the argument that an abnormally small proportion of drivers account for a large proportion of the accidents. This paper compares statistics developed from six-year data for 7, 800 California drivers with results predicted using compound Poisson models for driver accident involvement that assume specific variations in accident likelihood among drivers. The results indicate that the fraction of drivers accounting for various proportions of all accident involvements is too high to suggest that "chronic" accident repeaters are involved in most accidents. / National Science Foundation under Grants GK- 1685 and GK- 16471

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:MIT/oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/5238
Date07 1900
CreatorsFerreira, Joseph Jr.
PublisherMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Operations Research Center
Source SetsM.I.T. Theses and Dissertation
Languageen_US
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeWorking Paper
Format1746 bytes, 2259466 bytes, application/pdf
RelationOperations Research Center Working Paper;OR 004-71

Page generated in 0.0022 seconds