In face-to-face contexts, individuals typically make one social comparison per day and make more self-enhancing downward comparisons (to worse-off others) than potentially threatening upward comparisons (to better-off others). However, online social networks such as Facebook may be radically altering these standards. In two studies, I examined the frequency, direction, and impact of social comparisons on Facebook, and investigated potential moderating factors, including self-esteem. Participants reported making more upward than downward Facebook comparisons (Studies 1 and 2) and made an average of four comparisons in a 20-minute Facebook session (Study 2). Both low self-esteem and being motivated to log onto Facebook to get information with others predict making more comparisons on Facebook (Study 1) and participants with lower self-esteem may feel worse about themselves after making both upward and downward Facebook comparisons compared to their higher self-esteem peers (Study 2).
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:TORONTO/oai:tspace.library.utoronto.ca:1807/43235 |
Date | 05 December 2013 |
Creators | Midgley, Claire Elizabeth |
Contributors | Lockwood, Penelope |
Source Sets | University of Toronto |
Language | en_ca |
Detected Language | English |
Type | Thesis |
Page generated in 0.0325 seconds