This dissertation examines political thought in the English colonies during the seventeenth century and investigates the role played by empire in the colonists' demands for political rights. Much of the existing scholarship on early North American politics has employed a reactionary paradigm, emphasizing the colonists' struggles to secure their English rights within an increasingly intrusive empire. This dissertation argues that this approach, which was first developed in studies of colonial politics during the eighteenth century, overlooks the dynamic relationship between center and periphery that existed in early decades of English settlements. During the seventeenth century, there was a wide-ranging colonial literature that advertised the New World to an English audience and tackled the many anxieties that accompanied a transatlantic migration. In their efforts to attract migrants in sufficient numbers, these promotional tracts catered to the aspirations of potential settlers and reflected the widespread hope of individual improvement among the migratory population. Within the broader context of this colonial literature, the political demands of the colonists become progressive, not conservative, as they sought to secure the promised political empowerment that had accompanied their decision to migrate. For many colonists, the empire was a possible pathway to new liberties, not a threat to rights previously possessed. By the end of the seventeenth century, this dissertation argues that a liberal and radically populist understanding of empire had fully emerged in the colonial literature, which would become the primary language of justification for the colonists in their pursuit of increased political power in America. By integrating the efforts of colonists to create a self-serving definition of empire, this dissertation offers a more complex and dynamic understanding of politics and empire in seventeenth century North America.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:VANDERBILT/oai:VANDERBILTETD:etd-07162013-010207 |
| Date | 30 July 2013 |
| Creators | Vanzant, Kevin Singletary |
| Contributors | Jane Landers, Catherine Molineux, Dana D. Nelson, Daniel H. Usner, Jr. |
| Publisher | VANDERBILT |
| Source Sets | Vanderbilt University Theses |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-07162013-010207/ |
| Rights | unrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to Vanderbilt University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. |
Page generated in 0.0017 seconds