Despite their prominence in early modern English culture, fasts have remained virtually unstudied. This omission is unfortunate. Study of fast days provides a valuable window onto one of the most important stories of early modern England: the struggle to define English Protestantism and to unite the nation around one vision of it. Thereby, it also helps to answer critical questions. Why did peace last in the Church of England for over 80 years before the Civil War? Were puritans revolutionaries or pillars of the establishment? Was early modern England defined by conflict or consensus? Study of fasts offers answers because English Protestants used them to advance their visions of a properly reformed religion, church, society, and individual. They deemed such reform essential to establishing and maintaining order. Fasts, however, had the potential both to unite and to divide English Protestants over questions of reform and order.
More specifically, fasts were a critical space in which English Protestants created their religious self-understandings by interpreting themselves and the world around them. Fasts brought together an array of language, categories, and narratives central to these Protestant self-understandings. How contemporaries wove together the threads of self-understanding in large part depended on royal policies. These policies had a critical influence directly by themselves, and indirectly by shaping the relationship between puritans and conformists. The evidence from fasts shows that the policies of Elizabeth and James created factions but then managed tensions so as to contain conflict. In this context, centrifugal forces were weaker than centripetal ones. The policies of Charles, however, aggravated tensions and led to diverging self-understandings and increasing conflict. In this context, centrifugal forces became stronger than centripetal ones. This conclusion supports post-revisionist interpretations of the English Civil War as a puritan counter-revolution against Caroline-Laudian policies. It disputes the interpretations of many revisionists according to whom the Civil War arose as Puritans attacked the via-media which Anglicans had established in the Church of England.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:VANDERBILT/oai:VANDERBILTETD:etd-03312008-235308 |
| Date | 14 May 2008 |
| Creators | Doumaux, Thomas Cornell |
| Contributors | James A. Epstein, Joel F. Harrington, Helmut Walser Smith, Katherine B. Crawford, Paul Chang-Ha Lim |
| Publisher | VANDERBILT |
| Source Sets | Vanderbilt University Theses |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-03312008-235308/ |
| Rights | unrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to Vanderbilt University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. |
Page generated in 0.0016 seconds