xii, 92 p. A print copy of this thesis is available through the UO Libraries. Search the library catalog for the location and call number. / The purpose ofthis paper is to advocate Conflict Navigation as a new pedagogy
aimed at uniting co-curricular debate educators in the United States. Contemporary
collegiate debate demonstrates a crisis in pedagogy as seen in a history of "fractionation
through structural fortification". This lack of a sustainable pedagogical community has
proven to critically strain the resources and curricula of academic debate. Conflict Navigation (CN) represents a behavior-based approach to conflict with an
emphasis on ethical rhetoric. The primary mission of argument within a CN framework is
inquiry, cooperation, and engagement. / Committee in Charge:
Dr. David Frank, Clark Honors College;
Dr. James Crosswhite, English;
Dr. Sara Hodges, Psychology
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:uoregon.edu/oai:scholarsbank.uoregon.edu:1794/9980 |
| Date | 09 1900 |
| Creators | Donaldson, Aaron Paul, 1980- |
| Publisher | University of Oregon |
| Source Sets | University of Oregon |
| Language | en_US |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
| Relation | University of Oregon theses, Interdisciplinary Studies Program: Individualized Program, M.S., 2009; |
Page generated in 0.0017 seconds