RELIGION
JOHN COTTON: THE ANTINOMIAN CALVINIST
GREGORY ALLEN SELMON
Dissertation under the direction of Professor James P. Byrd
This project is a theological assessment of John Cottons life and ministry. This dissertation begins with the premise that Cottons early theological training and ministry experiences shaped him into an ardent defender of predestinarian thought. It argues that Cottons self-understanding as a defender of predestination against all forms of Arminianism provides the key to understanding his role in the numerous debates he faced during his lifetime. In particular, Cottons theological tendencies explain his role throughout the Antinomian Controversy in New England. They also explain how Cotton remained within the Puritan mainstream throughout his life and ministry.
This dissertation argues that one theological key to the Antinomian controversy was the tension between Cottons emphasis on Objective assurance found in Christs completed work as foundational for authentic assurance of faith while Thomas Shepard and other New England Elders emphasized Subjective assurance found through the evidence of personal holiness or the syllogism as foundational for authentic assurance. This dissertation illustrates that Cotton did not eliminate the need for Subjective assurance through the syllogism even as he emphasized Objective assurance as foundational for the Christian life. It also illustrates the many ties to Cottons theological emphasis concerning Objective assurance within the Puritan and Reformed communities. This includes the work of William Perkins and Richard Sibbes who had been used as primary examples in the work of previous scholarship to illustrate Cottons theological deviancy from orthodox Puritanism. This dissertation concludes that the root theological cause of the Antinomian controversy was the difference in emphasis concerning Objective and Subjective assurance.
This dissertation concludes with an investigation into Cottons ties with and dissimilarities from the Antinomian and Familist movement in England in the 1630s and 1640s. It argues that Cottons theology did not embrace any of the major tenets of Antinomianism or Familism. Instead, Cottons theology remained in tension with these theological critiques of Puritanism even as his thought retained an emphasis on Gods grace as primary within the Christian life.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:VANDERBILT/oai:VANDERBILTETD:etd-03192008-144956 |
| Date | 20 March 2008 |
| Creators | Selmon, Gregory Allen |
| Contributors | Professor James P. Byrd |
| Publisher | VANDERBILT |
| Source Sets | Vanderbilt University Theses |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-03192008-144956/ |
| Rights | unrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to Vanderbilt University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. |
Page generated in 0.0019 seconds