Return to search

Natural Theology and Natural History in Darwin's Time: Design, Direction, Superintendence and Uniformity in British Thought, 1818-1876

RELIGION
NATURAL THEOLOGY AND NATURAL HISTORY IN DARWINS TIME: DESIGN, DIRECTION, SUPERINTENDENCE AND UNIFORMITY IN BRITISH THOUGHT, 1818-1876
BOYD BARNES
Dissertation under the direction of Professor Dale A. Johnson
Nineteenth-century British natural theology and design arguments are studied in relation to contemporaneous geological and biological science. Close attention is given to the logical and evidential relationships of theological superintendence and the uniformity of nature as rival explanations for the evidently progressive direction of the history of the earth. The public and religious significance of the evidence for a theological superintendence of geological history is discussed, with special attention given to the science and natural theology of William Buckland, Adam Sedgwick, William Whewell and Baden Powell. Other works of natural theology, published in the 1830s and controversially significant although less overtly scientific, are more briefly considered. The increasingly scientific and decreasingly religious character assumed by natural theology over the course of an extended public controversy between superintendential and developmental explanations of natural history is then discussed, with special attention to Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation, Thomas Henry Huxley, Asa Gray and Alfred Russel Wallace. Other natural theologies of the same period are more briefly considered. The conclusion is reached, that nineteenth-century natural theology in Britain, having partly originated as a significant theological discourse in public religion that was founded upon a gloss of geological science, reached its historical term as the largely private and deeply scientific discourse of a relative few Darwinian men of science. Darwinism, therefore, may be appropriately considered a late episode in the history of natural theology, in addition to its significance for the history of science.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:VANDERBILT/oai:VANDERBILTETD:etd-03272008-122314
Date07 April 2008
CreatorsBarnes, Boyd
ContributorsRichard F. Haglund, James P. Byrd, Dale A. Johnson, James Hudnut-Beumler, Eugene A. TeSelle
PublisherVANDERBILT
Source SetsVanderbilt University Theses
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
Formatapplication/pdf
Sourcehttp://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-03272008-122314/
Rightsunrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to Vanderbilt University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.

Page generated in 0.0017 seconds