One of the notable lacks in current homiletic literature is a paucity of reflection on the work of the Holy Spirit and the relationship between that work and the task of preaching. This is true even in postliberal homiletics, despite the emphasis this model places on forming individuals and communities. Postliberal homiletics, such as that of Charles Campbell, ground preaching in an extreme christocentrism that relegates the Spirit to a secondary role.
<p>
This dissertation draws on the pneumatological ecclesiology developed by Reinhard Hütter to describe the work of the Holy Spirit as it relates to doctrine and the core practices of the church, and it develops the implications of that model for preaching. I suggest that, in such a model, preaching functions as a mode of practical theology that aims to form communities for the eschatologically-oriented praxis of doxology. Doctrine and the core practices are described in terms analogous to the Incarnation as the enhypostases of the Spirit. Doctrine mediates the promises of God that are implicit in the narrative of Christs life, death, and Resurrection. Christian practices are developed according to a sacramental logic as doxological acts in which the community is brought into communion with God through its own participation in the Christ event.
<p>
Preaching functions as an intermediary between these two poles in the role of that Hütter attributes to theology. Preaching as practical theology performs three key activities which correspond to three modes of the Spirits work. First, it discursively unfolds the economy of salvation and the promises of God. Second, it performs hermeneutical acts of theological judgment utilizing a phenomenology of the Spirit and the analysis of contextual challenges to doxological praxis. Third, preaching engages in ad hoc catechesis, an activity whose practical aspects are examined in light of John McClures Four Codes model of homiletic rhetoric.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:VANDERBILT/oai:VANDERBILTETD:etd-03272011-124135 |
| Date | 12 April 2011 |
| Creators | Tracy, Roy Alexander |
| Contributors | John S. McClure, Paul J. DeHart, Robin M. Jensen, David G. Buttrick |
| Publisher | VANDERBILT |
| Source Sets | Vanderbilt University Theses |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-03272011-124135/ |
| Rights | restricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to Vanderbilt University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. |
Page generated in 0.2143 seconds