Return to search

The Middle Voice of Love: Reading Singularity and Plurality from Different Cultures

This dissertation highlights the modes of existence (autonomy, relationality, and heteronomy) of the threefold contextual choices that readers privilege in their perception of the self and the other/Other. Examining Pauls vision of love in 1 Corinthians, we find that the religious (or heteronomous) dimension of love has been overlooked in critical biblical studies. While, out of their contexts, traditional biblical scholars render Pauls love as theologically and ethically authoritative (for individual believers; cf. autonomy), recently an increasing number of scholars treat it as rhetorically and ideologically utilitarian (in community and social life; cf. relationality). However, if honor and shame are pivotal values in ancient Mediterranean cultures, where honor has felt (in religious experience; cf. heteronomy), claimed (by individuals; cf. autonomy), and paid (in social relations; cf. relationality) aspects, then we must not sideline the heteronomous aspect of Pauls love. Coming from a group-oriented and honor-and-shame Chinese cultures in Malaysia, where everyone is always already interrelated, we argue through a structural semiotic exegesis that for Paul love is cruciform and as such charismatic, typological, eschatological, and performative. From a communal perspective, these non-objectifying features of Pauls love are a religious experience expressed in the intransitive and non-reflexive mode of middle voice where the subject, object, and receiver in the giving and receiving of love cannot be objectified. In light of this middle voice (cf. heteronomy), Pauls notion of the body of Christ as parts beyond a part (1 Cor. 12:27b) embodies a love that conceptualizes and configures plurality in the figure of common good without marginalizing singularity. In the middle-voice mode, singularity and plurality are a dynamic and hyphenated relation, just as the body of Christ co-arises with individual body members. Thus our structural semiotic analysis of the Lords Supper (11:17-34), the idol food conflict (8:111:1), and the spiritual gifts problem (12:114:40) shows that Paul coherently undergirds these issues with a cruciform love that deconstructs the Corinthian believers attempt to objectify their knowledge into a system that pigeonholes the believers relationship with the other/Other.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:VANDERBILT/oai:VANDERBILTETD:etd-11242014-192238
Date05 December 2014
CreatorsGoh, Meng Hun
ContributorsFernando Segovia, William Franke, K. K. Yeo, Kathy Gaca, Annalisa Azzoni, Daniel Patte
PublisherVANDERBILT
Source SetsVanderbilt University Theses
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
Formatapplication/pdf
Sourcehttp://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-11242014-192238/
Rightsunrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to Vanderbilt University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.

Page generated in 0.0022 seconds