Return to search

Pre-Nagpra Native American Reburial Policy and Its Implications on Cultural and Linguistic Classification

This thesis presents a historiography of classifying schemes of Native American language groups, compares several of the most prominent models, and examines these models with current cultural data. This research doesn't attempt to classify or group languages, but rather the intention is to use modern non-linguistic data (specifically, questionnaire data) to bolster one or more of the more prominent classification schemes. In 1989-90, a survey was sent out to tribes throughout North America, inquiring about tribal beliefs and policies pertaining to reburial issues. The respondents were researched and sorted according to five different linguistic and cultural classificatory schemes. Also the survey questions were sorted into genres, policy, cultural, and analysis, to examine the differences between genres and between classifications. These classifications and question genres were compared several ways, including testing for solidarity, variability, and deviation in answering. Several noticeable trends were found which have implications for sorting variability in Native America and for relations with modern tribes on the complicated issues of reburial and repatriation. / A Thesis Submitted to the Department of Anthropology in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Masters of Art. / Summer Semester, 2003. / June 24, 2003. / Repatriation, Reburial / Includes bibliographical references. / Michael K. (Michael Kent) Faught, 1950-, Professor Directing Thesis; Glen H. Doran, Committee Member; Bruce T. Grindal, Committee Member.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:fsu.edu/oai:fsu.digital.flvc.org:fsu_180290
ContributorsPendleton, Ryan Lawrence (authoraut), Faught, Michael K. (Michael Kent), 1950- (professor directing thesis), Doran, Glen H. (committee member), Grindal, Bruce T. (committee member), Department of Anthropology (degree granting department), Florida State University (degree granting institution)
PublisherFlorida State University, Florida State University
Source SetsFlorida State University
LanguageEnglish, English
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeText, text
Format1 online resource, computer, application/pdf
RightsThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s). The copyright in theses and dissertations completed at Florida State University is held by the students who author them.

Page generated in 0.0017 seconds