A comparative study of two different approaches in wind energy simulations has been made where the aim was to investigate the performance of two commercially available tools. The study includes the linear model by WAsP and the computational fluid dynamic model of WindSim (also featuring an additional forest module). The case studied is a small wind farm located in the inland of Sweden featuring a fairly complex and forested terrain. The results showed similar estimations from both tools and in some cases an advantage for WindSim. The site terrain is however deemed not complex enough to manifest the potential benefits of using the CFD model. It can be concluded that estimating the energy output in this kind of terrain is done satisfyingly with both tools. WindSim does however show a significant improvement in consistency when estimating the energy output from different measurement heights when using the forest module compared to only using the standardized roughness length.
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UPSALLA1/oai:DiVA.org:kth-103119 |
Date | January 2012 |
Creators | Timander, Tobias, Westerlund, Jimmy |
Publisher | KTH, Kraft- och värmeteknologi |
Source Sets | DiVA Archive at Upsalla University |
Language | English |
Detected Language | English |
Type | Student thesis, info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis, text |
Format | application/pdf |
Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0018 seconds