In order to address the deficiencies in the banking regulation revealed by the recent financial crisis the Basel III introduces two minimum standards for funding liquidity, Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) and Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR). The goal of this thesis is to analyze whether the NSFR is defined optimally or whether the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) will be forced to relax NSFR conditions similarly as happened by the LCR. Based on the approximation of the NSFR between 2007 and 2012 for a sample of 3 128 European banks we test the ability of banks to satisfy the NSFR. Our results suggest that the European banks have not started to converge to the NSFR yet. Despite this fact they should not have problems with meeting this requirement as 40.3% of banks in our sample would have already satisfied the NSFR in 2011. A Probit model analysis suggests that the NSFR requirement will decrease the probability of bank defaults and therefore increase the stability of the banking sector in the future which proves that the NSFR is correctly specified. Moreover, a simple stress testing shows that the stability of the system would not be improved anymore if the NSFR was defined more strictly. The current version of the NSFR therefore seems to be optimal and in our opinion should be...
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:nusl.cz/oai:invenio.nusl.cz:330438 |
| Date | January 2014 |
| Creators | Mošnová, Alžběta |
| Contributors | Teplý, Petr, Doležel, Pavel |
| Source Sets | Czech ETDs |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
Page generated in 0.002 seconds