<p>Purpose/Aim: The aim is to study the critics own views upon their profession and upon the development of criticism, and to thereafter set this in relation to contemporary theory and debates.</p><p>Material/Method: A qualitative study pursued through personal interviews. The results are categorized and split into different themes.</p><p>Main Results: Through media convergence and a changed media culture the conditions for criticism have also been altered. But in spite of various negative prophecies, these changes cause no serious threat to criticism. New forums and new forms of criticism actually increase the importance of the traditional ditto as the authoritative voice that holds the field together. Still, there are questions and fears about a future seemingly less and less predictable. The pace of these changes and the increased influence of the market can pose a threat unless the leadership doesn’t actively choose to uphold and protect traditional criticism.</p>
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UPSALLA/oai:DiVA.org:uu-106851 |
| Date | January 2009 |
| Creators | Skagegård, Ellinor |
| Publisher | Uppsala University, Media and Communication |
| Source Sets | DiVA Archive at Upsalla University |
| Language | Swedish |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Student thesis, text |
Page generated in 0.002 seconds