Return to search

Conscious and non-conscious bases of social judgment| Mindset and implicit attitudes in the perception of intergroup conflict

<p> Research on social judgment typically emphasizes one of three processes that enable unequivocal understanding of events with ambiguous causality. In the <i>social influence perspective</i>, people are susceptible to the interpretations offered by others. In the <i>explicit attitudes perspective</i>, people interpret events in line with their consciously held attitudes and values. In the <i>implicit attitudes perspective</i>, people interpret events in line with unconscious biases. The model investigated in the present study assumes that these processes vary in salience depending on people&rsquo;s mindset. When an event is encoded in high-level terms (i.e., its consequences), people&rsquo;s judgments reflect their explicit attitudes. When encoded in low-level terms (i.e., its details), however, such attitudes are less accessible, rendering people susceptible to social influence. In the absence of social influence, people with a lower-level mindset form judgments that reflect their relevant implicit attitudes. These hypotheses were tested in the context of an altercation between an African-American and a White male for which responsibility could reasonably be allocated to either party. Participants with low versus high implicit racial bias toward Blacks read a narrative concerning this altercation under either a low-level or a high-level mindset and then read a summary that blamed one of the parties or they did not read a summary. As predicted, low-level participants allocated responsibility to the African-American if they had a high implicit racial bias and to the White if they had a low implicit racial bias, regardless of the summary manipulation. Contrary to prediction, however, high-level participants&rsquo; allocation of responsibility did not reflect their explicit prejudicial attitudes. Instead, they corrected for their implicit biases in their trait inferences and affective reactions, in line with research suggesting that a high-level mindset promotes self-regulatory processes in social judgment.</p>

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:PROQUEST/oai:pqdtoai.proquest.com:3571438
Date29 August 2013
CreatorsSullivan, Susan D.
PublisherFlorida Atlantic University
Source SetsProQuest.com
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typethesis

Page generated in 0.0021 seconds