During the late 1970s Ghana was described as a collapsed and failed state. In
contrast, today it is hailed internationally as beacon of democracy and stability
in West Africa. In light of Ghana’s drastic image change from a fragile and even
collapsed polity to a resilient state, this thesis contributes to the statebuilding
debate by analysing the social change that occurred.
Grounded in a critical theory approach the thesis applies a political settlement
analysis to explore how power is distributed and changed over time between
contending social groups; exploring the extent to which this is embedded in
formal and informal institutional arrangements.
Ghana’s 2012 elections serve as an empirical basis and lens to observe the
country’s current settlement. This approach enables a fine grained within-case
comparison with Ghana’s collapsed post-independent settlement. The analysis
illustrates that while there has been no transformation of the Ghanaian state,
however, continuous incremental structural change has occurred within it, as
demonstrated by a structurally altered constellation of power.
While internationally propagated (neo-)liberal economic and political reforms
had a vital impact on the reconstruction process of state-society relations,
Ghana’s labelling as “success story” evokes the distorted idea of a resilient
liberal state. The sustainability of Ghana’s current settlement characterised by
electoral competitive clientelism depends on a continued inflow of foreign capital.
So far the mutually beneficial interest of portraying Ghana as a resilient state by its elites and donors ensures the flow of needed financial assistance to preserve the settlement. / Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC); European Commission Marie Curie Pre-doctoral Fellowship programme
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:BRADFORD/oai:bradscholars.brad.ac.uk:10454/15062 |
| Date | January 2015 |
| Creators | Ruppel, Julia Franziska |
| Contributors | Harris, David, Poku, Nana K. |
| Publisher | University of Bradford, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities |
| Source Sets | Bradford Scholars |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis, doctoral, PhD |
| Rights | <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />The University of Bradford theses are licenced under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Licence</a>. |
Page generated in 0.0021 seconds