This research is a meta-analytic review of the effects of transformational school leadership (TSL)-- a systematic, comprehensive synthesis of the quantitative research on transformational school leadership. The review method used in this research is standard meta-analysis supplemented by narrative synthesis and vote-counting methods. The types of effect sizes involved in meta-analytical calculations are correlation coefficients rs. The evidence reviewed was provided exclusively by unpublished theses or dissertations that were completed between 1996 and 2008.
This study identified 33 dimensions of transformational leadership as developed by various scholars and captured by a variety of leadership measures, which were synthesized into 11 core leadership dimensions. This study meta-analyzed the effects of transformational school leadership and its dimensions on a large range of school outcomes, including 17 school conditions (e.g., school culture, shared decision-making processes), 23 teacher-related outcomes (e.g., teacher satisfaction), and five types of student outcomes.
Transformational school leadership was most influential on teachers’ emotions and inner states. TSL had large effects on teachers’ individual inner states and their practices while it had small effects on their group inner states. Leaders effectively influence teachers’ psychological inner states and practices mainly through modeling good practices themselves, providing support and intellectual stimulation to teachers individually and setting shared school goals.
TSL was also very influential on school conditions. It had large effects on four key school conditions. This review detected significant, positive small direct effects of TSL on student achievements. The indirect effects of TSL on student learning vary when different school or teacher variables are controlled. This review identified seven important moderators and three mediators that significantly contributed to student learning along with TSL. Specific leadership practices that effectively influenced school and student outcomes were also examined and discussed.
Regarding the moderating effects of contextual and methodological factors, school level and leadership measures were found to moderate leadership impacts significantly in some cases. The findings of this study provide guidance for school administrators and policy makers who want to improve school leadership as a means of improving school quality.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:TORONTO/oai:tspace.library.utoronto.ca:1807/32052 |
| Date | 18 January 2012 |
| Creators | Sun, Jingping |
| Contributors | Leithwood, Kenneth |
| Source Sets | University of Toronto |
| Language | en_ca |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
Page generated in 0.0024 seconds