認購(售)權證課稅之問題在券商與財政部間已進行將近八年的時間，卻一直達不到共識。本論文就此問題做一深入之探討，究竟目前認購(售)權證之課稅規定是否妥當？若否，應如何課稅才算合理，以促進認購(售)權證市場的發展？
本研究分為兩個部分，第一部分係整理認購(售)權證課稅問題之各方論點，並對其提出評析；第二部分則主要利用事件研究法(event study)探討目前市場投資人對認購(售)權證課稅方式之反應。
在認購(售)權證課稅問題之制度面，本研究有以下結論：認購(售)權證之收入屬預估性所得，因認購(售)權證之收入在收現時係屬預收收入，需待履約時才能確定成本費用。預估性所得在整各交易流程的實現上充滿了不確定性，因此，對其成本費用之認定應較寬鬆；在履約日當日收入與成本費用即可確定，且須和其他部門分開列帳，認購(售)權證之收入與成本費用可單獨確定，且因果關係亦相當明確；認購(售)權證之風險可合理預估，並進行理性之避險行為，而避險對股票之買賣行為與一般投資思維有異，可以確定該買賣標的股票之動作係為減少履行認購(售)權證義務而可能產生之損失，故就本質而言，和認購(售)權證為同一交易。
本研究之實證共舉八個事件日進行討論，但是僅有券商敗訴之事件日結果較顯著，本研究推論可能的原因包括因為發行權證公司之業務有太多種類，因此受影響的因素較多，事件日發生之影響可能被其他和發行權證公司相關之議題抵消；此外，因課稅問題未解決，權證市場之環境尚未成形，投資人對此金融商品之興趣相對低落，因此對此議題之敏感度也較低；最後，因這八個事件日當中，對課稅權證相關之爭議結果其實都是紙上數字，對投資人來講，感受較不深刻，僅有在第一次取得敗訴時，真有費用產生之可能性，投資人才較有反應。 / The controversy of Tax Regulation of warrant between stockbroker and Ministry of Finance has been stalemate for almost 8 years. This study tries to discuss that whether the tax regulation of warrant are adequate? If not, how should it be to liven up the market?
This study is divided into two parts. The first part is to collect viewpoints of every aspect, then analyze and bring up new ideas. The second part will use event study research to discuss how the market responds to the tax regulation of warrant.
As to the system of the regulation, this study concluded as follows. Since the income is classified to unearned revenue when cash was received, and not until exercise day can the cost and expense be ascertained, the income of warrant belongs to predicted income. The process of completing the trade of predicted income is filled with uncertainties; therefore, the related cost and expense should be identified more flexibly. On the exercise day, the income, cost and expense of warrant are assured, and should be accounted separately from other segments; thus, the causal relationship is definite. The risk of warrant can be reasonably evaluated, and proceed rational hedge. Furthermore, the considerations of buying and selling target stocks are different from regular investment. Accordingly, it can be assured that the buying and selling are for minimizing the lost to meet the obligation of issuing warrant. Therefore, as to the essence, they are in the same trade process as issuing warrant.
This study takes 8 event days to discuss how the market responds to the issue of tax regulation of warrant. Only the date that stockbroker lost the lawsuit that the result are significant. This study infers that the probable reasons include that: there are too many businesses for the warrant issuer. Too many related issues may influence the market price of the issuer, thus offset the effect of tax event. Besides, the tax problem remains unsolved. The macro environment is immature, and diminishing the interest of investors, then consequently insensitive to the related event. At last, as to these 8 events, the results are all figures on the paper. Only when the stockbroker lost the lawsuit for the first time and will be real cash outflow that investors realize that there are losses. Hence, the respond are more significant.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:CHENGCHI/G0093353054 |
| Creators | 陳欣怡 |
| Publisher | 國立政治大學 |
| Source Sets | National Chengchi University Libraries |
| Language | 中文 |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Rights | Copyright © nccu library on behalf of the copyright holders |
Page generated in 0.0128 seconds