Return to search

探討合成型抵押擔保債券憑證之評價 / Pricing the Synthetic CDOs

根據以往探討評價合成型抵押擔保債券之文獻研究,最廣為使用的方法應用大樣本一致性資產組合(large homogeneous portfolio portfolio ; LHP)假設之單因子常態關聯結構模型來評價,但會造成合成型抵押擔保債券憑證與市場報價間的差異過大,且會造成相關性微笑曲線現象。由文獻顯示,單因子關聯結構模型若能加入厚尾度或偏斜性能夠改善以上問題,且對於分券評價時也會有較好的效果,像是Kalemanova et al. (2007) 提出應用LHP假設之單因子Normal Inverse Gaussian(NIG)關聯結構模型以及邱嬿燁(2007)提出NIG及Closed Skew Normal(CSN)複合分配之單因子關聯結構模型(MIX模型)在實證分析中得到極佳的評價結果。自2008年起,合成型抵押擔保債券商品結構開始出現變化,而以往評價合成型抵押擔保債券價格時,商品結構皆為同一種型式。本文將利用常態分配、NIG分配、CSN分配以及NIG與CSN複合分配作為不同的單因子關聯結構模型,藉由絕對誤差極小化方法,針對不同商品結構的合成型抵押擔保債券評價,並進行模型比較分析。由最後實證分析結果顯示,單因子NIG(2)關聯結構模型優於其他模型,也證明NIG分配的第二個參數 β 能夠帶來改善的評價效果,此項證明與過去文獻結論有所不同,但 MIX模型則為唯一一個符合LHP假設的模型。 / Based on the literature of discussing the approach for pricing synthetic CDOs, the most widely used methods used application of Large Homogeneous Portfolio (LHP) assumption of the one factor Gaussian copula model, however , it fails to fit the prices of synthetic CDOs tranches and leads to the implied correlation smile. The literature shows that one factor copula model adding the heavy-tail or skew can improve the above problem, and also has a good effect for pricing tranches such as
Kalemanova et al (2007) proposed the application of LHP assumption of one factor NIG copula model and Qiu Yan Ye (2007) proposed the application of LHP assumption of one factor NIG and CSN copula model. This article found that the structure of synthetic CDOs began to change since 2008. The past of pricing synthetic CDOs, the structure of synthetic CDOs are the same type, so this article will use different one factor copula model for pricing different structure of synthetic CDOs by using the absolute error minimization. This article will observe whether the above model can be applied in the new synthetic CDOs and implement of different type model for comparative analysis. The last empirical analysis shows that one factor NIG (2) copula model is superior to other models, more meeting the actual market demand, also proving the second parameter β of the NIG distribution able to bring about improvements in pricing results. This proving is different for the past literature conclusions. However, the MIX model is the only one in line with the LHP assumptions.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:CHENGCHI/G0099354002
Creators林聖航
Publisher國立政治大學
Source SetsNational Chengchi University Libraries
Language中文
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
RightsCopyright © nccu library on behalf of the copyright holders

Page generated in 0.0017 seconds