In this thesis I reject a sceptical argument that was recently formulated by Alan Chalmers (2003) by exploring the different meanings and implications of the thesis of the theory-ladenness of observation (TLO). I show that it is in fact a version of Agrippa's trilemma and choose a well-known solution to the latter, i.e., the causal-reliabilist theory of justification, in order to reject Chalmers' sceptical conundrum.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:bl.uk/oai:ethos.bl.uk:503866 |
| Date | January 2009 |
| Creators | Rochefort-Maranda, Guillaume |
| Publisher | University of Bristol |
| Source Sets | Ethos UK |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Electronic Thesis or Dissertation |
Page generated in 0.0019 seconds