陳鱣（1753－1817）乃乾嘉時期著名的校勘學家、藏書家。陳鱣精於經學，特別尊崇鄭玄；又通小學訓詁，尤好《說文》。陳鱣撰有《禮記集說參訂》，乃其《禮》學方面的重要著作。元明兩代，士子研習《禮記》，必讀元代陳澔《禮記集說》。惜《集說》過於顯淺，且以理學釋經，鄭《注》、孔《疏》删節甚多，頗為學者詬病。清代《禮》學復興，時人研習《禮記》，一方面以名物考證，補元代陳澔《禮記集說》疏漏之失；一方面以小學訓詁入手，推崇鄭《注》，參考眾說，還以《禮》經之舊。《禮記集說參訂》既補正《集說》，又取宗鄭玄，體現了清代研習《禮記》的主要風尚。本文先總結清代《禮記》學的學術背景及陳鱣的學術興趣及交誼等作，再對《禮記集說參訂》作出具體的介紹，並由陳鱣引用鄭《注》訓釋《禮記》的情況及其對鄭《注》的態度，評價《參訂》引用鄭《注》的得失及其對清代《禮記》研究的價值。 / Chen Zhan (1752-1817) was a prominent emendator and bibliophile in Qianlong-Jiaqing period of the Qing Dynasty. Expert in the study of Confucian classics, Chen particularly held Zheng Xuan in high esteem. Chen also processed a good knowledge of philological studies and semasiology, wherewith he had a liking of Shouwen jiezi. As for his scholarly pursuits, Liji jishuo canding was his important work in the study of Liji. In the earlier Yuan and Ming Dynasties, all scholars engaging in the Liji studies read Liji jishuo, which was completed in the Yuan Dynasty by Chen Hao. This work, however, not only lacks sophistication but also bases its interpretation on the school of Neo-Confucianism .It was heavily criticized in the academia for its substantial deletion of Zheng Xuan’s commentary and Kong Yingda’s annotation. Later in the Qing Dynasty saw the revival of the study of Liji. Relying on the textual research that rectified the omissions in Chen Hao’s work. It was also carried out by means of philological studies and semasiology. In this regards, Zheng Xuan’s commentary was held in high regards, and references was made from various sources to return Liji to its original form. Therefore, Liji jishuo canding was not only a supplement to Liji jishuo, but also a return to Zheng Xuan, a prevailing fashion in the Liji studies of the Qing Dynasty. This paper concludes the background of study of Liji in the Qing Dynasty, the research interests of Chen Zhen as well as his academic-networking with numbers of renowned scholars. A brief introduction of Liji jishuo canding will be included. How Chen Zhan’s cited Zheng Xuan’s commentary to explain and interpret Liji and what attitude he had towards Zheng’s commentary will also be taken in to account.It also evaluates the merits and faults of Chen Zhan’s citation of Zheng commentary and how valuable Liji jishuo canding is towards the study of Liji in the Qing Dynasty. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / 伍佩琦. / Parallel title from English abstract. / Thesis (M.Phil.) Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2015. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 68-74). / Abstracts also in English. / Wu Peiqi.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:cuhk.edu.hk/oai:cuhk-dr:cuhk_1202831 |
| Date | January 2015 |
| Contributors | 伍佩琦 (author.), 張錦少 (thesis advisor.), Chinese University of Hong Kong Graduate School. Division of Chinese Language and Literature. (degree granting institution.), Wu, Peiqi (author.), Zhang, Jinshao (thesis advisor.) |
| Source Sets | The Chinese University of Hong Kong |
| Language | Chinese, English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Text, bibliography, text |
| Format | electronic resource], electronic resource, remote, 1 online resource (83 leaves) : illustrations, computer, online resource |
| Rights | Use of this resource is governed by the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons “Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International” License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
Page generated in 0.0025 seconds