ABSTRACT
In the context of increasing incidence of stroke (but also an increasing rate of survival), non-invasive brain stimulation techniques (NIBS) are more frequently used for patients with post-stroke aphasia (PWA) and post-stroke depression (PSD). NIBS techniques, modulating brain plasticity, might offer valid, alternative therapeutic strategies. The aim is to reach a better outcome because treatment of aphasia can also improve post-stroke depression and vice versa. Based on two literature reviews on NIBS effects on PSD and post-stroke aphasia the conclusion is that, although the field is relatively new, and many more investigations with larger samples of patients are required, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) clinical application is well tolerated, safe, and feasible.
Starting from these encouraging data, we used a combination of TMS and electroencephalography (EEG) to explore the excitability modulation before and after active (20 sessions) and sham (20 sessions) tDCS in a double-blind crossover experiment. Four chronic non fluent PWA underwent 8 weeks of verbal exercises coupled with tDCS over the perilesional areas close to the left inferior frontal gyrus. To evaluate changes induced by tDCS, TMS-EEG responses over Brodmann area 6 (BA6) were computed using five different parameters. In addition, these data were compared with those recorded from a matched control group. The results indicated a slight improvement after tDCS stimulation (as compared to sham) for patients with Broca’s aphasia, but not for those with global aphasia. Also, TMS-evoked EEG responses recorded from the ipsilesional hemisphere were abnormal in individuals with chronic post-stroke aphasia (slower and simple responses with higher amplitudes) when compared to responses from the contralesional hemisphere and from the control group. Critically, the Global Mean Field Power (GMFP), Local Mean Field Power (LMFP) and Natural Frequency values were modulated by anodal tDCS. Despite these interesting results, further data are needed in order the obtain more direct, stronger evidence linking behavioral tDCS effects and neurophysiological data.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:unitn.it/oai:iris.unitn.it:11572/341338 |
| Date | 16 May 2022 |
| Creators | Bucur, Madalina |
| Contributors | Bucur, Madalina, Papagno, Costanza |
| Publisher | Università degli studi di Trento, place:TRENTO |
| Source Sets | Università di Trento |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess |
| Relation | firstpage:1, lastpage:186, numberofpages:186 |
Page generated in 0.0017 seconds