Elections are critical to the functioning of democracy, and many states have enacted various reforms designed to increase voter turnout. The reforms are referred to as ‘convenience voting’ methods and are designed to lower the perceived costs of voting. In 2006, Ohio adopted reforms that allowed no-excuse absentee voting and a period where voters could register and vote the same day. However, research still is unclear if
these reforms have any effect on turnout. By comparing turnout in Ohio in presidential
elections both before and after the reform to the same elections in Pennsylvania, a state
that has not enacted similar reform, the effect of convenience voting can be seen. Looking at turnout in each county within the states reveals that the reform enacted in Ohio has had no positive impact on turnout. / Department of Political Science
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:BSU/oai:cardinalscholar.bsu.edu:123456789/195954 |
| Date | 05 May 2012 |
| Creators | Voris, Ryan E. |
| Contributors | Hall, Steven Randolph |
| Source Sets | Ball State University |
| Detected Language | English |
Page generated in 0.002 seconds