Most buildings are built accessible but they often just becomes a tool for admiration. Slap a ramp on to a building and you're seen as inspirational and inclusive, but he actual usefulness becomes lost in admiration. Even less accessible is buildings built for person who’s neurodivergent, an umbrella-term for autism, ADHD, dyslexia and similar cognitive disabilities. Neurodiversity has been know for 30 years but we know just as much now, as then, about architecture and neurodiversity. Physical disabilities is and are possible to measure and create guidelines for, but not neurodiversity. Neurodiversity is a wide umbrella term on a spectrum of disorders that can not yet fully be measured. The traditional top down approach to accessible design has never worked and will never work for neurodiversity. A new approach is necessary. The last few years hints towards a new view from the disability community,- “If you fell like you’re disabled, you are disabled”. What if we looked at the design process from that view, that the building itself can create disabilities? What if we created buildings not to be admired, but buildings that admier the user? More at Thedisabledarchitect.com
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UPSALLA1/oai:DiVA.org:umu-195552 |
| Date | January 2022 |
| Creators | Forsberg, Adina |
| Publisher | Umeå universitet, Arkitekthögskolan vid Umeå universitet |
| Source Sets | DiVA Archive at Upsalla University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Student thesis, info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis, text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0026 seconds