Return to search

Understanding Phosphorus Dynamics of Two Alluvial Soils Grown with Corn at Different Phosphorus Rates

There is little information documented on the influence of soil properties on P availability of Louisiana alluvial soils thus this pot experiment was conducted in 2011 to: 1) evaluate the effect of P fertilizer rate on growth and development of corn grown on Perry clay and Commerce sl soils, 2) relate soil test P values using Mehlich-3 and Bray-2 procedures with yield, total biomass, and P uptake of corn, and 3) identify the soil properties that influence P partitioning into functional fractions of two alluvial soils. Different P fertilizer rates (0, 34, 67, 101 and 134 kg P2O5 ha-1) were applied, replicated four times and arranged in a randomized complete block design. After 30 days, corn was planted and grown until maturity. Mehlich-3 extractable-P, Bray-2, total-P and Pi fractions (labile-P, Al-P, Fe-P, reductant-P, and Ca-P) of soil samples collected at 30 DAP and at harvest were quantified.
The Bray-2 P values were about six times higher than Mehlich-3 P values for Commerce sl while for Perry clay, the amounts of P extracted by these two procedures were very similar (1:1 ratio). Both Bray-2 and Mehlich-3 extractable-P of both soils increased with increasing P rate. Commerce sl and Perry clay soils tested low to medium for Mehlich-3 extractable-P but responded differently with the application of P fertilizer. Grain yield of corn grown on Perry clay significantly responded to P rate but not in Commerce sl which was testing very high for Bray-2 extractable-P. The applied P fertilizer was transformed into Ca-P for Commerce sl while Perry cl transformed into Fe- and reductant-P. Overall, the labile- and Al-P at 30 DAP increased with increasing P rate. With time across P rates, both soils showed build-up of less readily-available reductant-P. For total-P, residual-P and total-Pi components, Commerce sl and Perry clay differed significantly (P<0.05) at both 30 DAP and harvest; while total-P and residual-P of both soils were not affected. Refinement of soil test P prediction should be pursued such that P fertilizer recommendations will not be based solely on P soil test.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:LSU/oai:etd.lsu.edu:etd-11122012-221157
Date19 November 2012
CreatorsDalen, Marilyn Sebial
ContributorsWang, Jim Jian, Mascagni, Henry Jr., Tubana, Brenda
PublisherLSU
Source SetsLouisiana State University
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
Formatapplication/pdf
Sourcehttp://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-11122012-221157/
Rightsunrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached herein a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to LSU or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below and in appropriate University policies, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.

Page generated in 0.0018 seconds