Return to search

Identification of Soybean Cultivar's Tolerance to Waterlogging Through Analyses of Leaf Nitrogen Concentration

Irrigation to soybean can cause unintended water to pond on the soil surface for more than a desired amount of time. Most soybean acreage in Louisiana is planted on poorly drained clay soils and waterlogging of soybean can cause substantial yield reductions. Although cultural practices are available for ameliorating the adverse effects of waterlogging, little is known about genotypic tolerance, therefore our objectives were to determine if percent leaf nitrogen concentration could be used as a criterion for screening for cultivar tolerance to waterlogging and to identify waterlogging tolerance among 48 commercially available soybean cultivars.
Forty-eight soybean cultivars were planted in May in 2002 and 2003 in an open- ended outdoor greenhouse at Ben Hur Research Farm near Baton Rouge, Louisiana on a Mhoon clay soil. Flooding treatment commenced the day the plants reached V4 and continued for seven consecutive days. Drained and waterlogged treatments were administered in the two halves of the greenhouse. One site received a 1-week waterlogging stress at the V4 growth stage and the other treatment received normal irrigation as necessary to avoid job stress. Each site was randomized complete block design with four replications and one factor (cultivars). Data obtained from the two year study were percent leaf nitrogen, leaf dry weight, and leaf nitrogen uptake. Analysis of variance was done by the combined analysis method of McIntosh (1983) with treatments and cultivars being fixed factors. Mean separation was accomplished by LSD (P<0.05) using appropriate LSD values to compare specific cultivars between drained and waterlogging treatments or to compare cultivars within or across drained and waterlogged treatments.
Results suggested that percent leaf nitrogen concentration can be an effective parameter for screening for waterlogging tolerance. Both cultivar and drainage significantly (P<0.0001) affected yield without significant interactions with other factors. The low C.V. (7.6%) shown by percent leaf nitrogen also supports its use as a screening criterion. Cultivars showing greatest percent nitrogen were not consistent across treatments. The decline in percent leaf nitrogen between treatments was not consistent. No correlation occurred for cultivar percent leaf nitrogen between treatments.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:LSU/oai:etd.lsu.edu:etd-04132004-154236
Date15 April 2004
CreatorsRiche, Curt Jude
ContributorsJames E. Board, Jim Wang, Wayne Hudnall
PublisherLSU
Source SetsLouisiana State University
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
Formatapplication/pdf
Sourcehttp://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-04132004-154236/
Rightsunrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to LSU or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.

Page generated in 0.0313 seconds