To examine the response of wheat to different temperatures and photoperiods at the proteomic level, a series of experiments was performed at the University of Saskatchewan, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, Department of Plant Science. Tandem-mass spectrometry (MS/MS) was used for protein identification. The iTRAQ approach was used to generate raw data for protein quantification. The Pro Group protein identification software was used for protein identification and quantification of differentially expressed proteins. Despite the input samples being from a plant,the software reported non-plant proteins. The traditional approach used by scientists to deal with this problem is to use sequence alignment software to find close green-plant homologs of the non-plant proteins from a plant-only database. Such a technique is problematic since homology-based sequence similarity does not generally equate to similarity of mass spectra. In this work a more radical approach was investigated and implemented. A bioinformatics pipeline was designed and implemented to report plant proteins misidentified by the Pro Group software. The approach drew its idea from the fact that MS/MS-based protein identification uses peptide fragments/ions bearing unique m/z values in the mass spectra. From the reported non-plant proteins and associated peptides, putative m/z values of the peptides are generated and then used to find alternate hits from a green plant-only database. The pipeline uses three different heuristics, each generating a list of candidate proteins. The proteins reported consistently across the three reported lists have the highest likelihood to be present in the original sample. To evaluate the performance of the pipeline, three separate experiments were performed. A set of known plant peptides, a combination of known plant and non-plant peptides and a set of known non-plant peptides were used as input to the pipeline. For each experiment a stringency value (threshold value) was set by the user. Better results were observed by specifying a tighter stringency; that is, more plant proteins were reported consistently across the three reported lists. The research presented in this thesis shows that m/z values, consideration of unique peptides and accounting for proteins with shorter sequences can be used to identify proteins. These characteristics can be used to identify proteins when limited information is available, in this case a list of non-plant proteins reported as being present in a plant-derived sample. The information available was limited because the original input data was already processed by the Pro Group software. The approach presented here is an alternative to a wet lab scientist using sequence alignment tools, sequence databases, and homology-based search. The pipeline can be enhanced by adding various other modules. The results presented here could be used as a foundation for a further study.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:USASK/oai:usask.ca:etd-09032010-092251 |
| Date | 07 September 2010 |
| Creators | Mehrotra, Sudeep |
| Contributors | Kusalik, Anthony, Gordon, Gray, Ross, Andrew, McQuillan, Ian, Van Kessel, Andrew |
| Publisher | University of Saskatchewan |
| Source Sets | University of Saskatchewan Library |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | http://library.usask.ca/theses/available/etd-09032010-092251/ |
| Rights | unrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to University of Saskatchewan or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. |
Page generated in 0.002 seconds