Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-01-03T19:32:05Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
RenataGodeiroCarlosCamara_DISSERT.pdf: 2273953 bytes, checksum: f7a25fbbea527aaa545f486dea05dc5e (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-01-05T20:07:10Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
RenataGodeiroCarlosCamara_DISSERT.pdf: 2273953 bytes, checksum: f7a25fbbea527aaa545f486dea05dc5e (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-01-05T20:07:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
RenataGodeiroCarlosCamara_DISSERT.pdf: 2273953 bytes, checksum: f7a25fbbea527aaa545f486dea05dc5e (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2016-05-31 / No Brasil, a cria??o dos Comit?s de Bacia Hidrogr?fica, institu?da pela Pol?tica Nacional de Recursos H?dricos, representou um importante avan?o legal na gest?o dos recursos h?dricos. Os Comit?s de Bacia representam um avan?o na legitimidade, pois abre espa?o para a participa??o social na gest?o. No entanto, a efetividade da gest?o exige um arranjo institucional capaz de assegurar participa??o social. A bacia hidrogr?fica do Rio Pitimbu (BHRP) est? situada na regi?o metropolitana de Natal e abrange parte dos munic?pios de Maca?ba, Parnamirim e Natal. Apesar da import?ncia estrat?gica como manancial de abastecimento, o rio Pitimbu tem sofrido os efeitos da urbaniza??o, com impactos no sistema fluvial e recursos h?dricos. Nesse contexto, este estudo pretende analisar a capacidade do modelo institucional em prover mecanismos de participa??o social na gest?o sustent?vel da ?gua e do uso do solo na bacia. Para isso, foram realizadas entrevistas semiestruturadas junto a onze membros do Comit? de Bacia. Os dados das entrevistas foram submetidos ? an?lise qualitativa mediante a utiliza??o do software MAXQDA?. Os resultados obtidos revelaram que o arranjo institucional vigente n?o ? capaz de reconhecer o Comit? de Bacia como elemento chave na gest?o dos recursos h?dricos, tal como preconizado na Lei 9433/97. O estudo revelou algumas caracter?sticas do Comit? que podem comprometer a sua efic?cia como f?rum participativo: a) baixa participa??o da sociedade civil no Comit?; b) alta participa??o do setor p?blico; c) inexist?ncia de um Plano de Bacia atualizado; d) maior parte das reuni?es destina-se a discutir assuntos internos e burocr?ticos; e) a inexist?ncia de uma Agencia de Bacia explica a aus?ncia de recursos financeiros; f) ao Comit? n?o ? atribu?do poder politico para influenciar no processo decis?rio. Al?m disso, a pouca articula??o entre esferas de governo explica o estado de desorganiza??o na gest?o dos recursos h?dricos. Finalmente, observou-se a necessidade de uma ampla reforma do arranjo institucional que permita implementar os instrumentos de gest?o da ?gua e do uso do solo na bacia. A descentraliza??o do poder, com a cria??o de mecanismos de participa??o social e moderniza??o do Estado representam desafios a serem alcan?ados. / The creation of the River Basin Councils (RBC) in Brazil, as established in the Brazilian Water Resources National Policy, represented a relevant legal advance in water resources management. RBC point to an advance towards legitimacy, because they may open a relevant space to social participation in water resources management. However, water management efficacy implies the existence of an institutional arrangement that promotes social participation. The Pitimbu River Basin is located at the Natal urban region, and comprises partly the municipalities of Maca?ba, Parnamirim and Natal. Despite of its strategic importance as potable water supply, Pitimbu River has been adversely impacted by urbanization, which affects fluvial system and water resources. In this context, this study is aimed at analyzing current institutional capacity in providing social participation mechanisms that can promote a sustainable water and land use management. For this purpose, semi-structured interviews were applied to eleven members of the RBC. Obtained data was analyzed qualitatively using the MAXQDA? software. Obtained results revealed that current institutional arrangement fails in recognizing RBC as a key element in water resources management, as established in the 9433/97 Act. It was observed some relevant RBC characteristics: a) poor civil society participation in the RBC; b) public sector participation in the RBC is predominant; c) an updated River Basin Water Plan is lacking; d) most of the RBC meetings prioritize internal and bureaucratic issues; e) the inexistence of a Basin Agency justifies the lack of funding; f) RBC political power in decision making process is lacking. Furthermore, articulation between government levels is poor and explains a condition of disorganization in water resources management. It was observed the need of a broad institutional reform that stimulates the implementation of management instruments. Finally, political power decentralization, social participation mechanisms, and State modernization still represent challenges to be attained.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/21573 |
| Date | 31 May 2016 |
| Creators | C?mara, Renata Godeiro Carlos |
| Contributors | 37994476449, http://lattes.cnpq.br/4599100661657180, Medeiros, Joana Darc Freire de, 37643240400, http://lattes.cnpq.br/1359759456699671, Pereira, Jaildo Santos, 44892071587, http://lattes.cnpq.br/6267179550890357, Moreira, L?cio Fl?vio Ferreira |
| Publisher | PROGRAMA DE P?S-GRADUA??O EM ENGENHARIA SANIT?RIA, UFRN, Brasil |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0027 seconds