Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-10-18T19:23:29Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
PauloSergioDaSilvaSantos_TESE.pdf: 1896244 bytes, checksum: 19f9b06c9ff2a924738d778da3e44f23 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-10-18T22:09:15Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
PauloSergioDaSilvaSantos_TESE.pdf: 1896244 bytes, checksum: 19f9b06c9ff2a924738d778da3e44f23 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-10-18T22:09:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
PauloSergioDaSilvaSantos_TESE.pdf: 1896244 bytes, checksum: 19f9b06c9ff2a924738d778da3e44f23 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017-03-20 / A presente pesquisa pretende estudar a apropria??o do poder hegem?nico da ci?ncia pelas redes editoriais de divulga??o cient?fica. Para tal, o objetivo geral est? pautado em discutir as estrat?gias sociodiscursivas empregadas pelas redes editoriais da divulga??o cient?fica para apropria??o do poder hegem?nico da ci?ncia, considerando, nessa din?mica, os modos de constru??o simb?lica atrav?s dos quais, estas constituem-se em Sistemas Peritos. Assim, analisaremos uma materialidade discursiva composta a partir de um corpus semiestruturado de 16 exemplares coletados. Os ve?culos de divulga??o cient?fica, ao tomarem a voz da ci?ncia para si, passam a usufruir de controle e prest?gio social exercidos pelo pr?prio discurso cient?fico em detrimento da sociedade classificada como ?leiga? na rela??o com o saber e m?todo cient?fico. Portanto, as redes editoriais que sustentam as revistas de divulga??o da ci?ncia t?m, tal qual um l?cus privilegiado de excel?ncia t?cnica, regulamentado a vida material dos cidad?os, agindo como um Sistema Perito, como designou Giddens (1991, 2002). Dessa forma, as pessoas est?o envolvidas em diversos sistemas que dominam, organizam e, de certa forma, sugerem modos de vida. S?o sistemas important?ssimos nos quais todos depositam confian?a. Assim sendo, o termo ?ci?ncia? encapsula metaforicamente esses sistemas socialmente legitimados e as revistas de divulga??o da ci?ncia t?m buscado usufruir dessa legitimidade, como se dela fosse parte a fim de sobreviver no mercado editorial brasileiro. Por isso, faz-se importante entender como o dom?nio do discurso cient?fico, tanto quanto o da divulga??o cient?fica proporcionam acesso a recursos materiais e inst?ncias de poder. A pesquisa est? fundamentada, principalmente, na An?lise Cr?tica do Discurso, a partir do marco anal?tico proposto por Fairclough (2001 [2008], 2003), Chouliaraki e Fairlcough (1999), para aprofundamento das quest?es referentes ? intertextualidade e ao hibridismo de g?nero das pr?ticas discursivas das redes editoriais da divulga??o cient?fica. A Abordagem Sociol?gica e Comunicacional do Discurso, por sua vez, apontar? a an?lise para as quest?es concernentes ? Comunica??o para a Mudan?a Social e aos tipos de poder, a partir de uma retextualiza??o de Bajoit (2006) proposta por Pedrosa (2012, 2013). Buscamos, ainda, revelar os mecanismos de naturaliza??o que contribuem para a constru??o simb?lica atrav?s dos modos de opera??o da ideologia descritos por Thompson (2009). E, por fim, o conceito de confian?a desenvolvido por Giddens (1991, 2002), nesse contexto, lan?ar? luz acerca do esvaziamento de tempo e espa?o como estrat?gia de universaliza??o do discurso das revistas de divulga??o cient?fica.Metodologicamente, a pesquisa est? situada em um paradigma qualitativo, inserido no ?mbito das Ci?ncias Humanas e Sociais, com foco na Lingu?stica Aplicada (LA). A LA vem desenvolvendo di?logos com as teorias sociais cr?ticas para a constru??o de um campo de estudos que extrapola a rela??o entre teoria e pr?tica e leva em considera??o todos os interactantes das situa??es estudadas. O resultado desenhou o perfil das duas principais publica??es de divulga??o cient?fica do mercado brasileiro.Ficou demonstrado de forma clara que se trata de verdadeiras arenas discursivas. A din?mica de funcionamento revelou mecanismos que contribuem para naturaliza??o de um hegemonismo artificial a ser desempenhado por esse tipo de publica??o. Essas din?micas e padr?es revelados pelo corpus da pesquisa indicam a necessidade de uma maior e mais ampla discuss?o em torno dos ve?culos de divulga??o de informa??es cient?ficas. / The present research intends to study the appropriation of science?s hegemonic power by the editorials of scientific divulgation. To that purpose, the general objective is to discuss the socio-discursive strategies employed by the publishing networks of scientific dissemination for the appropriation of the hegemonic power of science, considering in this dynamics the concept of symbolic construction through which it constitutes an expert systems. Thus, we will analyze a discursive materiality composed of a semi structured corpus of 16 collected copies. The dissemination vehicles of science, taking the voice of science to themselves, come to enjoy control and social prestige exercised by scientific discourse to the detriment of society classified as "lay" in relation to scientific knowledge and method. Therefore, the editorial networks that support the magazines of science dissemination have, as a privileged locus of technical excellence, regulated the material life of citizens, acting as an Expert System, according to what Giddens (1991, 2002) has designated. In this way, people are involved in various systems that dominate, organize and, to a certain extent, suggest ways of life. They are very important systems in which everyone places trust. Thus, the term 'science' metaphorically encapsulates these socially legitimized systems and the magazines of science dissemination have sought to enjoy this legitimacy, as if it were part of them, in order to survive in the Brazilian publishing market. Therefore, it is important to understand how the domain of scientific discourse as well as that of scientific dissemination provides access to material resources and instances of power. The research is based mainly on the Critical Discourse Analysis, from the analytical framework proposed by Fairclough (2001 [2008], 2003), Chouliaraki and Fairlcough (1999), to deepen the questions related to intertextuality and gender hybridity from the discursive practices of the editorial networks of scientific dissemination. The Sociological and Communicational Approach of the Discourse, in turn, will point the analysis to the questions concerning the Communication for Social Change and the types of power, from a re-contextualization of Bajoit (2006) proposed by Pedrosa (2012, 2013). We further try to reveal the mechanisms of naturalization that contribute to symbolic construction through the modes of operation of ideology described by Thompson (2009). And finally, the concept of trust developed by Giddens (1991, 2002), in this context, will shed light on the emptying of time and space as a strategy for the universalization of the discourse of scientific journals. Methodologically, the research is situated in a qualitative paradigm, inserted in the scope of Human and Social Sciences, focusing on Applied Linguistics (LA). LA has been developing fruitful dialogues with critical social theories to build a field of study that extrapolates the relationship between theory and practice and takes into account all the interacting situations studied, breaking the logic of established voices. Therefore, the research is framed in a transdisciplinary and critical perspective as it requires the recent practice in the field of Applied Linguistics. LA has been developing dialogues with critical social theories for the construction of a field of studies that extrapolates the relation between theory and practice and takes into account all the interactants of the studied situations. The result drew the profile of the two main scientific dissemination publications in the brazilian market. It has been clearly demonstrated that these are real discursive arenas. The dynamics of functioning revealed mechanisms that contribute to the naturalization of an artificial hegemony to be performed by this type of publication. These dynamics and patterns revealed by the corpus of research indicate the need for a broader and wider discussion about the vehicles for disseminating scientific information.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/24119 |
| Date | 20 March 2017 |
| Creators | Santos, Paulo S?rgio da Silva |
| Contributors | 12918245453, Cruz, Adriano Charles da Silva, 00860006409, Faria, Marilia Varella Bezerra de, 40604527420, Abreu, Ricardo Nascimento, 60968869572, Damaceno, Taysa M?rcia dos Santos Souza, 69317127568, Pedrosa, Cleide Emilia Faye |
| Publisher | PROGRAMA DE P?S-GRADUA??O EM ESTUDOS DA LINGUAGEM, UFRN, Brasil |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
| Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0134 seconds