While throughout the ages prominent thinkers have denounced for various reasons mistreatment
and killing of animals for food or sacrifice, the dominant western view has been that only
rational beings merit moral respect and value. Augustine developed, from Aristotle‘s thought of
a hierarchy of souls as well as from the Stoic concept of animals‘ irrationality, the idea that
animals share no fellowship with humans and thus are to be excluded from moral consideration.
In Aquinas‘ thinking the difference between rationality and irrationality became the difference
between immortal and mortal souls. This view furthered the development of an instrumental
view of animals. The perception that lower species are created to benefit the higher species has
become a dominant part of western Christian thought.
The main aim of this study is to investigate whether a respectful attitude towards animals, as
lived by Francis of Assisi and Albert Schweitzer, has a mystical basis (following the model of
Evelyn Underhill), and subsequently to consider whether and how mystical qualities as lived by
Francis and Schweitzer may contribute to an animal spirituality. In this thesis I explore the
moral valuation of animals in the Christian biblical and spiritual tradition, and further present
the outcome of this exploration as an alternative to an anthropocentric tradition and as a
contribution to contemporary protectionist approaches.
Franciscan sources and Schweitzer‘s oeuvre have been examined while applying Underhill‘s
concept of various characteristics and stages of the mystic way. I conclude that both Francis and
Schweitzer in their own unique ways qualify to be categorized as ‗mystics‘. Not through
rationality, but through experience and feeling, both have achieved real contact with other
beings and attained to the Mystery of life. Through their purified view they have been able to
perceive animals in a non-instrumental way and through their mystical experiences of union
they have sensed the common ontological basis and kinship between humans and animals—our
interdependency, utility, aesthetic value and theophany.
On the basis of scrutiny of biblical texts which touch upon the relations of humans and animals
with God I observe that an animal-inclusive moral concern, as demonstrated by Francis and
Schweitzer, finds biblical support. Each creature, as created and animated by God‘s rûaḥ
(‗Spirit‘) is transparent to God‘s glory and therefore able to reveal something of the Creator.
The Bible proclaims animals as God‘s property, with their own relation with their Creator, not
as created to satisfy human wants and wishes. A non-instrumental understanding of animals, as
found in biblical texts and as realized by Francis‘ and Schweitzer‘s awe for life, has ethical
implications for human-animal relations. Francis‘ and Schweitzer‘s views call us to question our
use of animals as our property, therewith sacrificing animal interests for our own.
A spirituality in which animals are contemplated as God‘s creatures, with their own worth and
their own relation to God, may lead to a different attitude towards animals. To the various
elucidated positions in the contemporary animal debate, with its emphasis on rights and reason,
Francis and Schweitzer may contribute through their example of an approach calling for
empathy, sympathy and compassion as an alternative point of departure. / PhD (Dogmatics), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus in cooperation with Greenwich School of Theology, 2015
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:NWUBOLOKA1/oai:dspace.nwu.ac.za:10394/15749 |
| Date | January 2014 |
| Creators | Vestjens, Johanna Christina Louisa |
| Source Sets | North-West University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
Page generated in 0.0023 seconds