Return to search

The Effects of Various Feed Additives on Growth Performance of Nursery Pigs

The objective of this research was to evaluate the effects of various feed additives on growth performance of nursery pigs. An experiment was conducted in which pigs were fed a conventional Phase 1 diet containing: 1) no salmon protein hydrolysate (SPH) or spray-dried porcine plasma (SDPP); 2-3) 1.5% SPH or SDPP; 4-5) 3.0% SPH or SDPP; or 6) 1.5% SPH and 1.5% SDPP. The results of this experiment showed growth performance was unaffected by source or level of protein during any growth phase. Overall gain:feed was greater (P = 0.08) for pigs fed the 1.5% level of protein than for those fed 3.0%, but there was no difference between protein sources. A second experiment was conducted in which pigs were fed a conventional Phase 1 diet (no mammalian protein) containing: 1) no SPH or SDPP; 2-3) 1.5% SPH or SDPP; or 4) 1.5% SPH and 1.5% SDPP. All pigs were fed common Phase 2 and 3 diets. The results of this experiment showed during Phase 1, gain:feed was greater (P < 0.05) for pigs fed SDPP than for those fed SPH. During Phase 2, ADFI was greater (P < 0.05) for pigs fed SPH than for those fed the control. During Phase 3, gain was greater (P = 0.08) for pigs fed SDPP than for those fed SPH. Overall growth performance was unaffected by protein source. An experiment was conducted in which pigs were fed Phase 1, 2, and 3 diets containing: 1) control; 2-5) 10.0% Nutri-Sure (NS), ground oat groats (GOG), ground steam rolled oats (SRO), or feeding oat meal (FOM). The results of this experiment showed during Phase 1, growth performance was unaffected by diet. During Phase 2, feed intake was greater (P < 0.09) for pigs fed GOG or SRO than for those fed NS. During Phase 3, feed intake was greater (P < 0.05) for pigs fed FOM than for those fed the control. Overall gain:feed was greater (P < 0.03) for pigs fed NS or SRO than for those fed the control. The results of these experiments indicate that SPH, SDPP, NS, GOG, SRO, and FOM are adequate additions to nursery diets.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:LSU/oai:etd.lsu.edu:etd-04112007-113057
Date11 April 2007
CreatorsTucker, Jennifer
ContributorsCathleen C. Williams, Thomas D. Bidner, L. Lee Southern
PublisherLSU
Source SetsLouisiana State University
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
Formatapplication/pdf
Sourcehttp://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-04112007-113057/
Rightsunrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached herein a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to LSU or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below and in appropriate University policies, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.

Page generated in 0.0016 seconds