The purpose of this investigation was to examine the evolution of Muisca chiefdoms from the viewpoint of household dynamics at the scale of a particular polity. The Bogotá polity, located near the modern town of Funza, was the core of one of the most powerful Muisca chiefdoms encountered by the Spanish. The investigation focused on the evolution of the Bogotá polity through the Herrera (800 B.C. - A.D. 800), Early Muisca (A.D. 800-1200), and Late Muisca (A.D. 1200-1600) periods. Artifacts were recovered through shovel probes and surface collections at 40 sites in order to identify discrete residential areas and recover samples of artifacts for inter-household comparison. Artifact distribution maps were used to delimit individual houselots from each of the three periods. Evidence for wealth and status differences among households was apparent as early as the Herrera period. The evidence from the Early Muisca and Late Muisca periods indicated increasing restrictions on access to wealth and status within the Bogotá polity over time. Feasting activities as a means of elite competition seem to have been more important early in the development of the Bogotá chiefdom. Evidence for craft production and regional exchange were scarce, indicating that these activities were not particularly intensive. Furthermore, such evidence was not exclusively associated with elite households. Some elite households may have had a slight advantage in access to better quality soils, although the soils in the area are generally quite good for agriculture. The examination of the relationship between households and raised fields within the Bogotá polity produced mixed results. From the perspective of top-down elite control, there was little evidence of elite association with the construction and maintenance of raised fields. However, the contrasting bottom-up perspective of intensive agriculture as a commoner initiative was also not supported, as there were no indications of any economic advantage for the households located nearby raised fields. Overall, the results of the investigation are somewhat puzzling given the ethnohistoric accounts of powerful chiefs, social complexity, and intensive economic activities. Based on the evidence presented here, economic factors do not appear to be central to the development of Muisca chiefdoms.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:PITT/oai:PITTETD:etd-04302003-143044 |
| Date | 29 May 2003 |
| Creators | Kruschek, Michael H. |
| Contributors | Olivier deMontmollin, Marc Bermann, Robert D. Drennan, John Frechione |
| Publisher | University of Pittsburgh |
| Source Sets | University of Pittsburgh |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | http://etd.library.pitt.edu:80/ETD/available/etd-04302003-143044/ |
| Rights | unrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to University of Pittsburgh or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. |
Page generated in 0.0019 seconds