Return to search

A Comparison between Structured and Object-Oriented Systems Analysis and Development: Modeling Tools and Artifact

Since the Software Engineering Institute published the Capability Maturity
Method Integration (CMMI) in 2003, many software firms have implemented it to
enhance its software quality assurance and international collaboration. Analysis and
design phases are two important phases for the software development. The artifacts of
these two phases mainly represented using the structured technique or the
object-oriented technique. This study proposed a methodology which provides
guidelines to compare the artifacts of these two techniques for an embedded system. The research methodology is articulated using the design science research methodology. A usability valuation with a real-world embedded system case is performed to demonstrate its applicability. The results provide evidences to enhance our understanding about the strength and weakness of these two nalysis and design techniques.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:NSYSU/oai:NSYSU:etd-0707110-113409
Date07 July 2010
CreatorsLin, Chien-hung
ContributorsShin-Shing Shin, Jen-Her Wu, none
PublisherNSYSU
Source SetsNSYSU Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Archive
LanguageCholon
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
Formatapplication/pdf
Sourcehttp://etd.lib.nsysu.edu.tw/ETD-db/ETD-search/view_etd?URN=etd-0707110-113409
Rightsnot_available, Copyright information available at source archive

Page generated in 0.0016 seconds