This study explored the adoption of computer, Health Information Technology (HIT), and Digital Imagery Technology (DIT) by art therapists for personal, professional, and client-focused tasks. This study used Everett M. Rogers' Diffusion of Innovation model to explore the diffusion of technology as a tool for professional practices and as a new media for art therapy treatment. Much of this research's design was adopted from diffusion research completed in the fields of art education and mental health treatment. Data was gathered using a survey questionnaire and interviews. The researcher concluded that the adoption of new media for art therapy treatment is a two stage process, which has been termed the Media Adoption Stage Model (MASM). The MASM consists of Rogers's diffusion model, Stage I adoption, and a secondary circular adoption process, Stage II adoption. The findings have implications for: 1) personal technology use, 2) professional tasks (i.e. record keeping, administrative, and appointments), 3) supervision, 4) teaching, 5) art-therapy treatment, and 6) student use of technology for art therapy education.This study explored the adoption of computer, Health Information Technology (HIT), and Digital Imagery Technology (DIT) by art therapists for personal, professional, and client-focused tasks. This study used Everett M. Rogers' Diffusion of Innovation model to explore the diffusion of technology as a tool for professional practices and as a new media for art therapy treatment. Much of this research's design was adopted from diffusion research completed in the fields of art education and mental health treatment. Data was gathered using a survey questionnaire and interviews. The researcher concluded that the adoption of new media for art therapy treatment is a two stage process, which has been termed the Media Adoption Stage Model (MASM). The MASM consists of Rogers's diffusion model, Stage I adoption, and a secondary circular adoption process, Stage II adoption. The findings have implications for: 1) personal technology use, 2) professional tasks (i.e. record keeping, administrative, and appointments), 3) supervision, 4) teaching, 5) art-therapy treatment, and 6) student use of technology for art therapy education. / A Dissertation Submitted to the Department of Art Education in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. / Spring Semester, 2006. / December 5, 2005. / Diffusion, Art Education, Computer, Technology, Art Therapy, Adoption / Includes bibliographical references. / Dave Gussak, Professor Directing Dissertation; Sande Milton, Outside Committee Member; Marcia Rosal, Committee Member; Penelope Orr, Committee Member.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:fsu.edu/oai:fsu.digital.flvc.org:fsu_176447 |
| Contributors | Peterson, Brent Christian (authoraut), Gussak, Dave (professor directing dissertation), Milton, Sande (outside committee member), Rosal, Marcia (committee member), Orr, Penelope (committee member), Department of Art Education (degree granting department), Florida State University (degree granting institution) |
| Publisher | Florida State University, Florida State University |
| Source Sets | Florida State University |
| Language | English, English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Text, text |
| Format | 1 online resource, computer, application/pdf |
| Rights | This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s). The copyright in theses and dissertations completed at Florida State University is held by the students who author them. |
Page generated in 0.0018 seconds