Return to search

A Comparison of the Relative Effectiveness of Mainstream Versus Pullout Treatment Programs in Addressing the Needs of At-Risk Students

The purpose of the study was to compare the relative benefits of treating at-risk students, those considered to be potential dropouts, by separating them into special classes at a separate facility—a pullout program—versus having them remain in regular classes with periodic supplemental counseling based upon individual needs—a mainstream program. To carry out the purpose of the study, students enrolled in the two types of treatment programs were compared in respect to retention in school, attendance, academic achievement based upon pretest and posttest scores, report card grades, and attitude toward school.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:unt.edu/info:ark/67531/metadc279002
Date12 1900
CreatorsHarrison, Robert S. (Robert Seidel)
ContributorsKemerer, Frank R., Teeter, Charles R., Hayslip, Bert, Frerichs, Dean K., Meeks, E. Bruce
PublisherUniversity of North Texas
Source SetsUniversity of North Texas
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis or Dissertation
Formatvi, 142 leaves, Text
RightsPublic, Copyright, Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved., Harrison, Robert S. (Robert Seidel)

Page generated in 0.0021 seconds