Return to search

Do People with ALS Perform Better with the Checkerboard Paradigm than with the Standard Row/Column P300-BCI?

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) provide communication that does not depend on neuromuscular activity. Several studies have demonstrated that those with advanced ALS can use noninvasive BCIs (e.g.,1,2,3). In able-bodied users, Townsend et al2 showed that a pseudorandom -or checkerboard paradigm (CBP) significantly improves P300-BCI performance compared to the standard or row/column paradigm (RCP). The CBP flashes stimuli in quasi-random groups that do not contain adjacent items, and it ensures at least six flashes between flashes of a given item. The combination of these two factors improves accuracy and bitrate. Townsend et al [2] also reported anecdotal improvements with the CBP in people with ALS who had extensive experience with the RCP. The present study seeks to verify these results in a larger group of people with ALS.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:ETSU/oai:dc.etsu.edu:etsu-works-2-1935
Date01 June 2010
CreatorsFeldman, Sara, Petaccio, Vincent, Sellers, Eric W., Townsend, George, Vaughan, Theresa M., Hauser, Christopher, Harriman-Patterson, Terry, Wolpaw, Jonathan R.
PublisherDigital Commons @ East Tennessee State University
Source SetsEast Tennessee State University
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
SourceETSU Faculty Works

Page generated in 0.0079 seconds