With the new way of sequencing by NGS new tools had to be developed to be able to work with new data formats and to handle the larger data sizes compared to the previous techniques but also to check the accuracy of the data. Coverage analysis is one important quality control for NGS data, the coverage indicates how many times each base pair has been sequenced and thus how trustworthy each base call is. For clinical purposes every base of interest must be quality controlled as one wrong base call could affect the patient negatively. The softwares used for coverage analysis with enough accuracy and detail for clinical applications are sparse. Several softwares like Samtools, are able to calculate coverage values but does not further process this information in a useful way to produce a QC report of each base pair of interest. My master thesis has therefore been to create a new coverage analysis report tool, named CAR tool, that extract the coverage values from Samtools and further uses this data to produce a report consisting of tables, lists and figures. CAR tool is created to replace the currently used tool, ExCID, at the Clinical Genomics facility at SciLifeLab in Uppsala and was developed to meet the needs of the bioinformaticians and clinicians. CAR tool is written in python and launched from a terminal window. The main function of the tool is to display coverage breath values for each region of interest and to extract all sub regions below a chosen coverage depth threshold. The low coverage regions are then reported together with region name, start and stop positions, length and mean coverage value. To make the tool useful to as many as possible several settings are possible by entering different flags when calling the tool. Such settings can be to generate pie charts of each region’s coverage values, filtering of the read and bases by quality or write your own entry that will be used for the coverage calculation by Samtools. The tool has been proved to find these low coverage regions very well. Most low regions found are also found by ExCID, the currently used tool, some differences did however occur and every such region was verified by IGV. The coverage values shown in IGV coincided with those found by CAR tool. CAR tool is written to find all low coverage regions even if they are only one base pair long, while ExCID instead seem to generate larger low regions not taking very short low regions into account. To read more about the functions and how to use CAR tool I refer to User instructions in the appendix and on GitHub at the repository anod6351
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UPSALLA1/oai:DiVA.org:uu-379228 |
| Date | January 2019 |
| Creators | Odelgard, Anna |
| Publisher | Uppsala universitet, Institutionen för biologisk grundutbildning |
| Source Sets | DiVA Archive at Upsalla University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Student thesis, info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis, text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | UPTEC X ; 18 034 |
Page generated in 0.0022 seconds